2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

There's that scary picture: Attention bias to threatening scenes in Williams syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, individuals with WS are less able to detect social threat signals, as evidenced by difficulties in perceiving negative emotions through facial expressions and voices (Plesa-Skwerer, Faja, Schofield, Verbalis, & Tager-Flusberg, 2006) and in detecting angry faces (Santos, Silva, Rosset, & Deruelle, 2010). Indeed, they show a greater attention bias towards processing happy faces (Dodd & Porter, 2011), a tendency to perceive unfamiliar faces as more positive (Bellugi et al, 1999) and to rate happy facial expressions as more approachable (Frigerio et al, 2006). These findings contrast with those reported in SAD subjects who are typically hypervigilant to facial expressions, tend to judge neutral faces as negative , and rapidly avoid facial stimuli perceived as threatening (Machado-deSousa et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, individuals with WS are less able to detect social threat signals, as evidenced by difficulties in perceiving negative emotions through facial expressions and voices (Plesa-Skwerer, Faja, Schofield, Verbalis, & Tager-Flusberg, 2006) and in detecting angry faces (Santos, Silva, Rosset, & Deruelle, 2010). Indeed, they show a greater attention bias towards processing happy faces (Dodd & Porter, 2011), a tendency to perceive unfamiliar faces as more positive (Bellugi et al, 1999) and to rate happy facial expressions as more approachable (Frigerio et al, 2006). These findings contrast with those reported in SAD subjects who are typically hypervigilant to facial expressions, tend to judge neutral faces as negative , and rapidly avoid facial stimuli perceived as threatening (Machado-deSousa et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two previous studies have examined attention bias to threatening scenes and emotional faces in WS using the dot-probe paradigm (Dodd & Porter, 2010, 2011). Results showed attention bias to threatening scenes and happy faces, but not angry faces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, detailed data analyses reported by Järvinen and colleagues (2012) showed that those with WS commonly misidentified negative affective stimuli as positive, indicating that their relative strength in the perception of positive social stimuli may occur at the expense of reduced attention and sensitivity to negative affective stimuli. It is noteworthy, however, that individuals with WS show an opposing behavioural and neural pattern (i.e., hypervigilance) to threatening non-social stimuli (e.g., scenic pictures) (Dodd & Porter, 2011;Meyer-Lindenberg et al, 2005a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%