2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2004.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal analysis and characterisation of cellulose grafted with acrylic monomers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first broad peak at about 70°C is related to water evaporation, while the second endothermic peak in the 110°C-130°C range is connected to the glass transition temperature of water-plasticized chitosan macromolecules. 18 Chitosan nanobubbles showed a T peak at 124.6°C, while the chitosan solution showed a T peak at 114.7°C. The melting temperatures differed from those of a pH 5.0 reference chitosan solution (of the same polymer concentration), reflecting a change in the polysaccharide matrix in the nanobubble structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The first broad peak at about 70°C is related to water evaporation, while the second endothermic peak in the 110°C-130°C range is connected to the glass transition temperature of water-plasticized chitosan macromolecules. 18 Chitosan nanobubbles showed a T peak at 124.6°C, while the chitosan solution showed a T peak at 114.7°C. The melting temperatures differed from those of a pH 5.0 reference chitosan solution (of the same polymer concentration), reflecting a change in the polysaccharide matrix in the nanobubble structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is evident from The counter reading at peak intensity at 22˚ is said to represent the crystalline material and the peak intensity at 18˚ corresponds to the amorphous material in cellulose [60,61] , Percentage Crystallinity [62] and crystalline index [63,64] were calculated and tabulated in Table 4. A poor crystallinity index in case of untreated hemp fibers reinforced in cellulose filled epoxy matrix means poor order of cellulose crystals to the fiber axis during treatments, indicated by the lower crystallinity index.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are presented in Table I. Percentage polymer loading (%PL), percentage graft yield (%GY), and percentage grafting efficiency (%GE) formed were calculated by using following methods: 25 Percentage polymer loading (% PL)…”
Section: Graft Copolymerizationmentioning
confidence: 99%