1985
DOI: 10.1016/0040-6031(85)85103-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal and calorimetric analysis of cellulose, its derivatives and their mixtures with plasticizers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
1
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our measurements did not confirm the heat capacity anomalies between (300 and 350) K reported in refs and and the concave heat capacity curves between 140 and 300 K observed in refs and . The heat capacity of microcrystalline cellulose from this work and refs , , and are compared in Figure .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Our measurements did not confirm the heat capacity anomalies between (300 and 350) K reported in refs and and the concave heat capacity curves between 140 and 300 K observed in refs and . The heat capacity of microcrystalline cellulose from this work and refs , , and are compared in Figure .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…3c above 235 K, where the experimental c p is increasingly larger than calculated results as temperature increases. This is in line with observations made by Hatakeyama et al [2] and Uryash et al [20]. Furthermore, experimental data for amorphous cellulose in the 80-200 K temperature range is best fitted with skeletal vibrations described by only a uniform frequency distribution, i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is clear that skeletal vibrations mainly contribute in the 5-200 K range, whereas the change in heat capacity with temperature above 250 K is due to group vibrations. This change in behaviour from one dominated by skeletal to group vibrations is typical [5,19], since the previous The equilibrium melting (glass transition) temperature, T m is taken from [20,[36][37][38][39][40] a Despite its amorphous nature, molecular modelling and experimental results [41] indicate that the glass transition temperature is similar to that of crystalline cellulose have vibrational frequencies in the lower frequency range. Therefore, these vibrations are excited before the group vibrations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%