1999 ISES Solar World Congress 2000
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008043895-5/50188-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal and Electrical Yield of a Combi-Panel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this work stopped in 1996. Next, the Eindhoven University of Technology (EUT) started a PhD project during 1994-1998 [42][43][44][45][46], which focussed on covered PVT modules for DHW applications. In 1999, Ecofys, TNO and the EUT jointly carried out a technology-and market review for PVT [9,47].…”
Section: History Of Pvt Water Heatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this work stopped in 1996. Next, the Eindhoven University of Technology (EUT) started a PhD project during 1994-1998 [42][43][44][45][46], which focussed on covered PVT modules for DHW applications. In 1999, Ecofys, TNO and the EUT jointly carried out a technology-and market review for PVT [9,47].…”
Section: History Of Pvt Water Heatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies that examine the performance include estimates of the different types of panel absorption, such as sheet and tube, completely wet and the channel box types, analysis of several different types of collectors PV/T (sheet and tube, channel, free-flowing dual absorption), as shown in Figure 11 [38]. The experimental results indicated that the overall gain heat from the collector is 9.7 kWh, while the average thermal and electrical efficiency of the system is 30% and 17% respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Yield Of Different Combined Hybrid Pv-thermal Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual electrical and thermal yield of the PV/T system is lower, because of high solar reflectance and high infrared emission [11], thereby obtaining higher U-value [44] compared to separate conventional collectors yields. However, the PV/T system produces more energy per unit area at lower cost [45], compared to a PV module and a thermal collector adjacent to each other [13]. A comparison showed that the reduced thermal efficiency of the PV/T system was attributed to: [11] 1) The available solar energy reduced by the fraction converted to electricity by the PV cells.…”
Section: Pv/t Collectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the PV/T collectors have lower electrical efficiency and thermal efficiency compared to the individual conventional collectors [13]. But, the PV/T systems are more efficient than conventional solar thermal or solar photovoltaic systems per unit area [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%