2021
DOI: 10.1364/josab.418635
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal and non-thermal intensity dependent optical nonlinearities in ethanol at 800  nm, 1480  nm, and 1560  nm

Abstract: Intensity dependent self-action of a continuous wave (CW) or pulsed optical beam can lead to spatial or spectral effects upon propagation through a nonlinear medium, which can be described as an intensity dependence of the refractive index, known as self-phase modulation (SPM). In this work, we revisit the nonlinear optical propagation of a CW and a CW mode-locked (CW-ML) high repetition rate [ ∼ megahertz (MHz)] laser propagating through pure ethanol in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the N vs I (number of rings versus intensity) curves, we can infer the nonlinear refractive index (n 2 ) related to the SSPM as ,, normaln 2 = N I λ L eff where N is the number of rings, I is the incident intensity, λ is the wavelength, and L eff is the sample effective length given by L eff = 1 normale α 0 L α 0 0.25em where L is the cuvette length and α 0 is the linear absorption coefficient. In this approach, we are neglecting the converging behavior of the beam throughout the sample and considering that its transversal area is approximately constant inside the cuvette.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the N vs I (number of rings versus intensity) curves, we can infer the nonlinear refractive index (n 2 ) related to the SSPM as ,, normaln 2 = N I λ L eff where N is the number of rings, I is the incident intensity, λ is the wavelength, and L eff is the sample effective length given by L eff = 1 normale α 0 L α 0 0.25em where L is the cuvette length and α 0 is the linear absorption coefficient. In this approach, we are neglecting the converging behavior of the beam throughout the sample and considering that its transversal area is approximately constant inside the cuvette.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an area that deserves full attention and efforts to refine the nonlinear measurements where many existing artifacts are found in this field. Therefore, this paper paves the way to study from a metrological point of view the phase shift induced by the thermal lens effect that comes sometimes with the instantaneous Kerr induced ones as was found initially in [27] and more recently in [5].…”
Section: Simplified Relations Using Z-scan-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Its diffracted beam-waist was measured from the simulation profile to be ω d = 2.8806 mm while theoretically ω d = λD/πω 0 f = 2.8846 mm. Scanning the cell from negative to positive z values, the peak intensity as shown in profiles ( 1) and ( 2) first increases and then suddenly decreases (3), and finally its value increases again in (4) and (5). This is typical behavior of the Z-scan method with negative phase shifts, which show a higher transmittance at pre-focal positions followed by a lower transmittance at post-focal positions [19].…”
Section: Intensity Profiles Versus Zmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [ 8 ], the authors investigated the molecular/particle dynamics and, in [ 9 ], by measuring photothermal parameters of opaque solids. Moreover, Z-scan [ 10 ] based methods were performed at different regimes of excitation to understand the origin of the third-order nonlinear optical response [ 11 ] and the influence of the accumulated thermal effect, which can be an artifact in femtosecond closed-aperture Z-scan measurements [ 12 ]. Additionally, they can be used to evaluate optically-induced temperature changes in colloidal samples for photothermal therapy [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%