2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal characterization of the build chamber in electron beam melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the preheat 1 scan involves the electron beam scanning the bed with a series of parallel lines, it is possible that some of the powder particles which were in the vicinity of the preheat 1 scan lines might have experienced high local temperatures, that were greater than the β-transus temperature and underwent certain level of α′→α+β transformation without reaching the melting point (~1650ºC) [46]. On the other hand, it is likely that the temperature at the away-melt zone region would be lower by ~70ºC of the set preheat temperature [47]. Nevertheless, since the analysed powder particles revealed no significant microstructural transformations (Figure 5) and showed no evidence of β peaks in the XRD plot, it is deduced that the powder particles at the edges of the powder bed were less affected by the EB-PBF processing conditions.…”
Section: Powder Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the preheat 1 scan involves the electron beam scanning the bed with a series of parallel lines, it is possible that some of the powder particles which were in the vicinity of the preheat 1 scan lines might have experienced high local temperatures, that were greater than the β-transus temperature and underwent certain level of α′→α+β transformation without reaching the melting point (~1650ºC) [46]. On the other hand, it is likely that the temperature at the away-melt zone region would be lower by ~70ºC of the set preheat temperature [47]. Nevertheless, since the analysed powder particles revealed no significant microstructural transformations (Figure 5) and showed no evidence of β peaks in the XRD plot, it is deduced that the powder particles at the edges of the powder bed were less affected by the EB-PBF processing conditions.…”
Section: Powder Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the powder particles previously contained in the hoppers, after the spreading, increase their temperature because of conduction and irradiation phenomena from the substrate. The next phase, preheating, which precedes the melting phase, is designed to achieve gradually an even higher temperature, up to 60-70% of the melting point of the processed material [43][44][45]. Then, thanks to the vacuum environment, the additional heat provided during the subsequent layers preserves a high working temperature over the entire build.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most detailed study on the influence of thermal cycling on Ti-6Al-4 V microstructures was performed on a laser-based, powder-fed AM system with a different thermal history than E-PBF [78]. While some numerical models do exist for E-PBF [79,80], a model incorporating the specific scan strategies and build geometry used here would be required for a complete understanding of the influence of thermal cycles on the microstructural evolution, especially to answer the important question of whether the cycles are sufficient to transform the a' fully or partially back to b. However, some general hypotheses can still be proposed based on the observations in [78] and other literature.…”
Section: Microstructural Evolution During E-pbfmentioning
confidence: 99%