2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal characterization of tropical biomass feedstocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
52
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
52
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Feed is specified as a non-conventional component in Aspen Plus and defined in the simulation model by using the ultimate and proximate analysis. The characteristics of different feedstocks (MSWs, wood, green wastes and coffee bean husks) sourced from the literature (BEST Energies Australia Pty Ltd. Report [14], Wilson et al [15], Naveed et al [11] and Chen et al [10]) are given in Table 1. The model is based on minimization of the Gibbs free energy at equilibrium.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feed is specified as a non-conventional component in Aspen Plus and defined in the simulation model by using the ultimate and proximate analysis. The characteristics of different feedstocks (MSWs, wood, green wastes and coffee bean husks) sourced from the literature (BEST Energies Australia Pty Ltd. Report [14], Wilson et al [15], Naveed et al [11] and Chen et al [10]) are given in Table 1. The model is based on minimization of the Gibbs free energy at equilibrium.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the higher content of lignin in ABM shell than the ABM wood, as shown in Table 1, its burning was aided by the oil content of the kernel (housed in the shell). The burnout temperatures were, however, higher than 377, 365, 364, 378 and 382 °C obtained by Wilson et al (2011), for mill bagasse, palm stem, cashew nut shells, coffee husks and sisal bole biomass species found in the tropics. In spite of these being all tropical plants, two different biomass samples are most likely to differ in their thermal characteristic behaviour due to agronomical differences.…”
Section: Burn-out Temperaturementioning
confidence: 87%
“…It is defined as a temperature where the rate of weight loss consistently decreases to less than 1%.min -1 (Wilson et al, 2011). At this temperature, the sample decomposition can be assumed to be nearly complete and there is no further noticeable mass loss in the form of volatiles.…”
Section: Burn-out Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, TG can monitor the sample mass of substance as a function of temperature and/or time, whereas DTG is an approach performed by detecting the rate of mass loss. These two approaches have been used recently in thermal degradation of biomass samples (Eero, 1981;Jakab et al, 1997;Meszaros et al, 2007;Sebestyén et al, 2011;Shafizadeh, 1968;Varhegyi et al, 1988;Villanueva et al, 2011;Wilson et al, 2011), investigations of sewage sludge pyrolysis (Dumpelmann et al, 1991;Magdziarz and Werle, 2014), and combustion (Font et al, 2001;Magdziarz and Wilk, 2013), as well as co-combustion of sewage sludge and other substances (Otero et al, 2002;Park and Jang, 2011;Yu and Li, 2014). Operation parameters of SCPs, such as temperature and atmosphere conditions, were also evaluated using both TG and DTG approaches (Calvo et al, 2013;Manara and Zabaniotou, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%