2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3090487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal conductivity and interface thermal conductance of amorphous and crystalline Zr47Cu31Al13Ni9 alloys with a Y2O3 coating

Abstract: Copyright by the AIP Publishing. Shukla, Nitin C.; Liao, Hao-Hsiang; Abiade, Jeremiah T.; et al., "Thermal conductivity and interface thermal conductance of amorphous and crystalline Zr47Cu31Al13Ni9 alloys with a Y2O3 coating," Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 081912 (2009); http://dx

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the penetration depth of the modulated pump excitation is inversely proportional to the square root of the modulation frequency, the TDTR data taken at 11 MHz has minimal sensitivity to the buried GaSb/GaAs interface compared to 1.07 MHz data. Therefore, we use the two TDTR data sets ͑11 and 1.07 MHz͒ to determine h K at both the Al/GaSb and GaSb/GaAs interfaces in a similar procedure as outlined by Shukla et al 16 In our analysis, we use bulk literature values for the heat capacities of each layer and assume a bulk thermal conductivity of the GaAs substrate. [17][18][19] We estimate the reduced thermal conductivity of the Al transducer layer from electrical resistivity measurements on the Al film.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the penetration depth of the modulated pump excitation is inversely proportional to the square root of the modulation frequency, the TDTR data taken at 11 MHz has minimal sensitivity to the buried GaSb/GaAs interface compared to 1.07 MHz data. Therefore, we use the two TDTR data sets ͑11 and 1.07 MHz͒ to determine h K at both the Al/GaSb and GaSb/GaAs interfaces in a similar procedure as outlined by Shukla et al 16 In our analysis, we use bulk literature values for the heat capacities of each layer and assume a bulk thermal conductivity of the GaAs substrate. [17][18][19] We estimate the reduced thermal conductivity of the Al transducer layer from electrical resistivity measurements on the Al film.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R bd is interpreted by an average phonon transmission probability at the interfaces in our approach, as described already above. It has been reported in the literature that the R bd in the nanoscale falls into the range of 1.0 × 10 −9 –1.0 × 10 −6 m 2 ·K/W [41,42,43,44], so the RSWNT-PEEK was varied between 1.158 × 10 −9 and 1.158 × 10 −6 m 2 ·K/W, which corresponds to an average phonon transmission probability of 0.001–1.0. Similarly, the RWS2-PEEK ranged from 2.32 × 10 −10 to 2.32 × 10 −8 m 2 ·K/W, corresponding to an average phonon transmission probability from 0.005 to 0.5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the close packing of the more adjacent laterally ordered regions, the number and size of the crystalline regions of Bombyx mori silk fibroin is increased by heat treatment. It is well known that the crystal phase is expected to have a higher thermal conductivity than the amorphous one . Based on the fact that how difficult it is to characterize the tiny structural change precisely and how dramatically the thermal property changes by even small structural change, it leads to an important point that, thermal property characterization can be used to reflect the overall structural change of the protein fibers under various treatments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%