2009
DOI: 10.1115/1.3139110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Conductivity Measurements of Nylon 11-Carbon Nanofiber Nanocomposites

Abstract: Carbon nanofibers (CNFs) were incorporated into nylon 11 to form nylon 11-carbon nanofiber nanocomposites via twin screw extrusion. Injection molding has been employed to fabricate specimens that possess enhanced mechanical strength and fire retardancy. The thermal conductivity of these polymer nanocomposites was measured using a guarded hot plate method. The measurement results show that the room temperature thermal conductivity increases with the CNF loading from 0.24±0.01 W/m K for pure Nylon 11 to 0.30±0.0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…. This interfacial thermal resistance was within range of the interfacial resistance reported for Nylon 11‐carbon nanofiber composites . Thus, the overall low thermal conductivities of the mats were expected to be primarily due to the high interfacial resistances between the nanofibers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…. This interfacial thermal resistance was within range of the interfacial resistance reported for Nylon 11‐carbon nanofiber composites . Thus, the overall low thermal conductivities of the mats were expected to be primarily due to the high interfacial resistances between the nanofibers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Nonetheless, given that the volume fractions used in the calculations were determined from experimentally measured densities of the samples, the only plausible explanation for such a theoretical under-prediction at these distinct ratios is that the interface resistance is lower than the value used in the analysis (;10 À6 m 2 K/W). 42 Similarly, previous studies dealing with the combinations of fillers attribute an abrupt increase in thermal conductivity for certain relative concentrations 31,32 to the nanoscale fillers bridging the gaps between the GNPs. In other words, the nanoscale fillers adhere to the graphite flakes and provide a "fin-like" structure to the surface of the graphite, providing a larger contact area and an additional thermal path, thus lowering the thermal resistance.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity Measurement Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The average lateral dimensions used in the analysis were 500 and 5 lm for graphite and graphene, respectively, and were taken from information presented in vendor data sheets. The value of the interface thermal resistance, R K % 10 À6 m 2 K/W, was taken from the study of Moore et al 42 concerning carbon nanofibers and nylon-11 composites. This value was chosen over the other values (8 Â 10 À8 m 2 K/W for CNT/CNT interfaces 28 and 3.7 Â 10 À9 m 2 K/W for graphene/graphene interfaces 27 ) because it represents the resistance at filler/matrix interfaces, whereas the latter are only applicable for filler/filler interfaces.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity Measurement Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-linking restricts mobility of the polymeric chains, which ultimately delays the decomposition of the materials. A previous study [16] on CNF-reinforced polymer composite has revealed that reinforcement of CNFs, even with small weight percent, improve the thermal conductivity of the material. Therefore, it is also expected for this study that thermal conductivity of the polymer has improved specifically with 2 wt % loading of CNFs, which could be the reason that by dispersing 2 wt % CNFs, thermal stability of the material has improved, as heat dissipates more quickly at 2 wt % loading of CNFs.…”
Section: Thermal Gravimetric Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%