2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019gl085228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Conductivity of Snow, Firn, and Porous Ice From 3‐D Image‐Based Computations

Abstract: Estimating thermal conductivity of snow, firn, and porous ice is key for modeling the thermal regime of alpine and polar glaciers. Whereas thermal conductivity of snow was widely investigated, studies on firn and porous ice are very scarce. This study presents the effective thermal conductivity tensor computed from 64 3‐D images of microstructures of snow, antarctic firn, and porous ice at −3, −20, and −60°C. We show that, in contrast with snow, conductivity of firn and porous ice correlates linearly with dens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific surface area values are however systematically higher than the ones from microCT, especially in the first 0.4 m (about 25 m 2 kg −1 vs. 15 m 2 kg −1 ). Similar deviations were reported in Calonne et al (2019), suggesting possible biases in the specific surface area measurement methods. In our case, the deviations might have been likewise caused by equi-temperature metamorphism in the snow blocks during transport and storage, leading to a specific surface area decrease, the higher the initial specific surface area, the higher the evolution rate.…”
Section: Structural and Crystallographic Fabric Profilessupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specific surface area values are however systematically higher than the ones from microCT, especially in the first 0.4 m (about 25 m 2 kg −1 vs. 15 m 2 kg −1 ). Similar deviations were reported in Calonne et al (2019), suggesting possible biases in the specific surface area measurement methods. In our case, the deviations might have been likewise caused by equi-temperature metamorphism in the snow blocks during transport and storage, leading to a specific surface area decrease, the higher the initial specific surface area, the higher the evolution rate.…”
Section: Structural and Crystallographic Fabric Profilessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Despite a reduced structural fabric anisotropy with depth (Calonne et al, 2019), the layered structure of the snowpack inherited from anisotropy variations may still survive and impact the lock-in zone characteristics (thickness and depth) down to the close off depth (Fujita et al, 2009(Fujita et al, , 2014Gregory et al, 2014;Fourteau et al, 2019). In particular, the existence of a seasonal signal in the structural fabric strengthens the interpretation of Gregory et al (2014) that hypothesizes an impact of the microstructure on the lock-in processes.…”
Section: The Necessity Of Quantifying Both Fabric Tensorsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have shown that vertical anisotropy in the snowpack results from temperature-gradient metamorphism (Srivastava et al, 2010;Calonne et al, 2017). The effective heat conductivity of snow results from several aspects such as structure, density, history of the snow pack, and applied temperature (Satyawali et al, 2008;Calonne et al, 2019). The latter varies on a daily and seasonal time scale as recorded by the AWS (Figure 5).…”
Section: Seasonal Anisotropy and Depositionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The transition between these two behaviors lies around 350 to 400 kg m −3 . Note that Calonne et al (2019) report that a similar transition between the low and high-density samples also exists under limited kinetics, but occurs at a much lower density of about 100 kg m −3 .…”
Section: Effective Thermal Conductivity and Diffusion Coefficient As mentioning
confidence: 79%