2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9cp01943j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal conductivity of two-dimensional BC3: a comparative study with two-dimensional C3N

Abstract: The thermal conductivities of single-layer BC3 (SLBC) sheets and their responses to environmental temperature, vacancy defects and external strain have been studied and compared with those of single-layer C3N (SLCN) sheets by molecular dynamics simulations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
9
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…/mK is reasonably matching the value of 64.8 W/mK reported byMortazavi et al in 2016 [43]. Moreover, a thermal conductivity value of 451±30 W/mK was obtained for C3B structures which is close to the value reported by Song et al (~ 488 W/mK) in 2019 using reverse NEMD method[50]. The values of 𝑘 ∞ for all structures in the X and Y directions are shown in Figures 9 to 11 for the carbon structures having nitrogen atoms, the pure carbon structures and the carbon structures having boron atoms, respectively.In order to have a complete picture, Fig.12(a) gathers the thermal conductivities of all structures for two main chirality directions in one figure.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…/mK is reasonably matching the value of 64.8 W/mK reported byMortazavi et al in 2016 [43]. Moreover, a thermal conductivity value of 451±30 W/mK was obtained for C3B structures which is close to the value reported by Song et al (~ 488 W/mK) in 2019 using reverse NEMD method[50]. The values of 𝑘 ∞ for all structures in the X and Y directions are shown in Figures 9 to 11 for the carbon structures having nitrogen atoms, the pure carbon structures and the carbon structures having boron atoms, respectively.In order to have a complete picture, Fig.12(a) gathers the thermal conductivities of all structures for two main chirality directions in one figure.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…On this basis, to simulate the thermal conductivity of carbon-nitride 2D systems, commonly the researchers use the Tersoff parameters constructed over Optimized Tersoff [22] proposed by the Kinarci et al [73]. Using the aforementioned interatomic potential setup along with the NEMD approach, the thermal conductivity of C 3 N monolayer with infinite length was predicted to be 805-520 [54], 810-826 [74], 775 [75], 806 [76], 800 [77] and 780 [78] W mK −1 . In a latest NEMD study [79] authors also reported consistent values for the length effect on the thermal conductivity of C 3 N monolayer with previous studies [54,74,76].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, among the aforementioned lattices, only the C3N shows a densely packed structure, and the rest include low-density nanoporous lattices. 2D polyaniline C3N is already known to show outstandingly high thermal conductivity [36,37,46,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] and mechanical properties [47][48][49][50][51], stemming from its densely packed lattice and strong covalent interactions between carbon and nitrogen atoms. In contrast, the presence of nanoporosity in the atomic structure promotes phonon scattering and can lead to substantial suppression of lattice thermal conductivity, which has been theoretically confirmed [15,[52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%