1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf01113573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal decomposition of ferrous oxalate dihydrate studied by direct current electrical conductivity measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
52
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, such surprising conclusion is not supported by experimental data at all [6] or results from XRD analyses [5,9], where distinguishing between Fe 3 O 4 and γ-Fe 2 O 3 spinel structures is problematic, especially in the nanocrystalline state. On the other hand, formation of magnetite in static air can be expected in the case of the pressed samples as suggested by Rane et al on the basis of electrical conductivity and magnetization measurements [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, such surprising conclusion is not supported by experimental data at all [6] or results from XRD analyses [5,9], where distinguishing between Fe 3 O 4 and γ-Fe 2 O 3 spinel structures is problematic, especially in the nanocrystalline state. On the other hand, formation of magnetite in static air can be expected in the case of the pressed samples as suggested by Rane et al on the basis of electrical conductivity and magnetization measurements [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Such conclusion is based on the paramagnetic component observed in the room temperature Mössbauer spectrum along with a sextet of hematite. Using XRD, many authors have identified maghemite and hematite in the mixture of reaction products after isothermal heating at different temperatures (200-350 °C) with a general agreement that α-Fe 2 O 3 is formed by thermally induced structural transformation of γ-Fe 2 O 3 [5][6][7]11]. Despite the results of dynamic TG analyses (no weight increase), powdered character of samples and static air atmosphere representing good oxidation conditions, two-step formation of maghemite is expected via Fe 3 O 4 , which is considered as the primary oxidation product [5,6,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the most commonly used precursors is ferrous oxalate dihydrate (FeC 2 O 4 ·2H 2 O), which is a typical example of a readily decomposable substance. The course of ferrous oxalate thermolysis has been extensively studied in recent years, [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] although it is still difficult to reach an unambiguous conclusion from the published data. Differences in the published results arise due to the different experimental conditions applied, which substantially affect the final composition of the iron oxide product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] In recent years, many studies have been published on the thermal behavior of ferrous oxalate (dihydrate), FeC 2 O 4 ·2H 2 O. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] However, much less attention has been paid to ferric oxalate, Fe 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 , [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] in spite of an interesting phenomenon, which is the formation of a certain amount of ferrous oxalate during its thermally induced decomposition in an inert atmosphere [35,36,38,39] . Their proportion accurately reflects actual disproportionation/synproportionation/redisproportionation processes likely encouraged by the preserved size and morphology of the initial ferric oxalate crystals and that are dependent on temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%