2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal degradation of poly(vinylpyridine)s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11] The degradation of the P2VP brush commenced at significantly higher temperatures (Ͼ 395°C) as indicated by a MS signal of pyridine (m/z = 79). [12] The small peak of the propene fragment observed at higher decomposition temperature (395°C) might either be attributed to a delayed release of PAMA due to a coating of P2VP at the core-shell transition zone or to a decomposition of the pyridine ring to a fragment of m/z = 41 as reported in the literature. [12] Since the cumulative mass loss (25 %) up to 320°C corresponds with the weight content of PAMA in the block copolymer the latter explanation appears more likely.…”
Section: P2vp-b-pama/apm Hybrid Nanowiresmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[11] The degradation of the P2VP brush commenced at significantly higher temperatures (Ͼ 395°C) as indicated by a MS signal of pyridine (m/z = 79). [12] The small peak of the propene fragment observed at higher decomposition temperature (395°C) might either be attributed to a delayed release of PAMA due to a coating of P2VP at the core-shell transition zone or to a decomposition of the pyridine ring to a fragment of m/z = 41 as reported in the literature. [12] Since the cumulative mass loss (25 %) up to 320°C corresponds with the weight content of PAMA in the block copolymer the latter explanation appears more likely.…”
Section: P2vp-b-pama/apm Hybrid Nanowiresmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…[12] The small peak of the propene fragment observed at higher decomposition temperature (395°C) might either be attributed to a delayed release of PAMA due to a coating of P2VP at the core-shell transition zone or to a decomposition of the pyridine ring to a fragment of m/z = 41 as reported in the literature. [12] Since the cumulative mass loss (25 %) up to 320°C corresponds with the weight content of PAMA in the block copolymer the latter explanation appears more likely. The hybrid formed between positively charged P2VP-b-PAMA nanobrushes and APM was amorphous (Scheme 1D, Figure 2A).…”
Section: P2vp-b-pama/apm Hybrid Nanowiresmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…PS degrades in a single step by a depolymerization reaction to yield mainly, the monomer, styrene [25,26]. P2VP decomposes by a complex degradation mechanism producing also protonated oligomers in addition to monomer and low mass oligomers [27]. Previous DP-MS studies revealed that during the pyrolysis of PS-b-P2VP copolymer, each component decomposes independently via the decomposition pathways identified for the corresponding pure homopolymers as expected for a block copolymer [28,29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Thermal decomposition mechanisms of polystyrene, PS, and poly(2-vinylpyridine), P2VP, have been studied extensively [25][26][27]. PS degrades in a single step by a depolymerization reaction to yield mainly, the monomer, styrene [25,26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FE of the catalyst remained high for processing temperatures up to 450 °C. Further increase in the processing temperature led to a decrease in FE, probably due to the dissociation of pyridine moieties [46] and the aggregation of Co. [47] To increase the available catalytic sites, Co-P4VP-derived catalyst was synthesized with a ketjenblack carbon support (ECP600JD) with higher surface and electrochemical active areas (Table S1 and Figure S2, Supporting Information). Processing time, composition, and the catalyst loading [3] were subsequently optimized at 1.5 h, 3 wt% Co composition, and 4 mg cm −2 loading, respectively, leading to a remarkable values for FE (92%) and EE (58%) for CO 2 RR at 85 mA cm −2 ( Figure S3, Supporting Information).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%