2019
DOI: 10.3354/meps12912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal dependence of seagrass ecosystem metabolism in the Red Sea

Abstract: The Red Sea is one of the warmest seas with shallow seagrass ecosystems exposed to extreme temperatures, in excess of 35°C, during the summer months. Seagrass meadows are net autotrophic ecosystems, but respiration increases faster than primary production with temperature. This may lead to a shift from an autotrophic to a heterotrophic system at the highest temperatures. Although tropical seagrasses are adapted to high temperatures, the metabolic rates of Red Sea seagrasses have not yet been reported. Here we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our metabolic rates for H. uninervis meadows diverge from those recently reported for a mixed meadow of H. uninervis and C. serrulata in the central Red Sea (Burkholz et al, 2019). Their reported GPP and R rates were two and five times higher than what we recorded for mono-specific meadows of H. uninervis.…”
Section: Metabolic Rates Of Seagrass Meadows In the Red Sea Compared contrasting
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our metabolic rates for H. uninervis meadows diverge from those recently reported for a mixed meadow of H. uninervis and C. serrulata in the central Red Sea (Burkholz et al, 2019). Their reported GPP and R rates were two and five times higher than what we recorded for mono-specific meadows of H. uninervis.…”
Section: Metabolic Rates Of Seagrass Meadows In the Red Sea Compared contrasting
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, NCP rates and GPP/R ratios were about nine and two times higher than in our study. The differences among studies might result from the difference in standing stock above ground biomass among meadows, which was about 20 times higher in the mixed meadow (average 269 g DW m −2 ; Burkholz et al, 2019) than in our mono-specific meadows (average 12 g DW m −2 ). This large difference in biomass could derive from several factors such as (i) mixed meadows achieve higher above ground biomass than the mono-specific meadows of the same species , (ii) we removed the epiphytes on the leaves which can achieve substantial biomass loads (Nelson, 2017), but Burkholz et al (2019) did not, (iii) differences in depth/light availability (0.5-5 m in our study and 0.7 m in Burkholz et al, 2019), and (iv) potential differences in sediment composition.…”
Section: Metabolic Rates Of Seagrass Meadows In the Red Sea Compared contrasting
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations