2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2183584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal diffusivity of rods, tubes, and spheres by the flash method

Abstract: The flash method is the most used technique to measure the thermal diffusivity of solid samples. It consists of heating the front face of an opaque slab by a short light pulse and detecting the temperature evolution at its rear surface, from which the thermal diffusivity is obtained. In this paper, we extend the classical flash method to be used with rods, tubes, and spheres. First, the temperature evolution of the back surface of solid cylinders, hollow cylinders, and spheres is calculated. Then, experimental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, Salazar et al [3] used this method to calculate the in-plane effective thermal diffusivity of unidirectional fiber-reinforced composites. Salazar and co-workers also extended this classical flash method to study the surface temperature resulting from nonplanar samples, such as solid cylinders [4], hollow cylinders [5,6], and spheres [7]. Recently, Madariaga and Salazar [8] exploited this elegant method to express the surface temperature of multilayered spherical samples with continuously varying in-depth thermal conductivity.…”
Section: List Of Symbols λmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Subsequently, Salazar et al [3] used this method to calculate the in-plane effective thermal diffusivity of unidirectional fiber-reinforced composites. Salazar and co-workers also extended this classical flash method to study the surface temperature resulting from nonplanar samples, such as solid cylinders [4], hollow cylinders [5,6], and spheres [7]. Recently, Madariaga and Salazar [8] exploited this elegant method to express the surface temperature of multilayered spherical samples with continuously varying in-depth thermal conductivity.…”
Section: List Of Symbols λmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Subsequently, Salazar et al used this method to calculate the in-plane effective thermal diffusivity of unidirectional fiber-reinforced composites [17] and the surface temperature of multilayered cylindrical samples [18]. Salazar et al [19] also extended this classical flash method to be used with non-planar samples, such as solid cylinders, hollow cylinders, and spheres. Recently, Madariaga and Salazar [20] exploited this elegant method to express the surface temperature of multilayered spherical samples with continuously varying in-depth thermal conductivity.…”
Section: Nomenclature λmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For decades, research in photothermal techniques has been restricted to samples with flat surfaces. Specifically, with the increasing applications of photothermal radiometry (PTR) to the characterization of materials with curved surfaces, studies on nonflat (e.g., cylindrical or spherical) solids [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] have been reported in recent years. In this study, we present a generalized theoretical model of a multilayered spherical structure using the Green function method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Assumed thermal-conductivity depth profiles of two inhomogeneous solid spheres with different thermal gradients, Q (mm −1 ); (b1, b2) thermal-wave responses of two inhomogeneous spheres and comparison with results obtained with the quadrupole method; (c1, c2) normalized amplitude and phase at different azimuthal angles, θ ; and (d1, d2) the normalized amplitude and phase of spherical solids with various diameters at θ = 0 • the thermal-wave responses of the two inhomogeneous spheres, diameters = 2 mm with different Q, and the results obtained by the quadrupole method (line)[11] are shown for comparison. Different depth profiles with different Q factors imply different effective thicknesses of the inhomogeneous layer, which result in different peak or valley positions in both amplitude and phase channels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%