2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal effects on the diesel injector performance through adiabatic 1D modelling. Part II: Model validation, results of the simulations and discussion

Abstract: In this paper, a one-dimensional computational model of the flow in a common-rail injector is used to compute local variations of fuel temperature (including the temperature change produced upon expansion across the nozzle) and analyse their effect on injector dynamics. These variations are accounted through the adiabatic flow hypothesis, assessed in a first part of the paper where the model features are also described. They imply variations in the fuel properties and the flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the pilot quantity increased to 3 mg, stable conditions were reached but not with a fully developed flow, probably due to the sac pressure loss during the SOI process. 33,40,4345 Sac pressure decreases mainly for two reasons: the volume of the displaced needle that is filled with fuel from its surroundings, plus the fuel that is injected into the chamber. Thus, even though the needle reached lift levels where it does not have any influence on the internal flow development, fully developed flow conditions are not reached until sac pressure recovers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the pilot quantity increased to 3 mg, stable conditions were reached but not with a fully developed flow, probably due to the sac pressure loss during the SOI process. 33,40,4345 Sac pressure decreases mainly for two reasons: the volume of the displaced needle that is filled with fuel from its surroundings, plus the fuel that is injected into the chamber. Thus, even though the needle reached lift levels where it does not have any influence on the internal flow development, fully developed flow conditions are not reached until sac pressure recovers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After obtaining the fuel temperature in the nozzle hole, combined with the fuel pressure in the nozzle hole, the fuel density under the current temperature and pressure can be calculated according to the fuel density physical property formula. Then, the volume flow rate of fuel injected from the nozzle holes can be calculated by Equation (10):…”
Section: Influence Of Fuel Heating Effects On the Cycle Injection Qua...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This led to a change in the cavitation characteristics at the entrance of the injection hole, which significantly affected the injection quantity. Salvador et al [9] and Payri et al [10] used AMESim software to establish an adiabatic flow model for a CR injector and analyzed the variation in the fuel temperature increase at each orifice in the injector for different pre-main injection time intervals. They noted that the temperature increase in the fuel after flowing through an orifice was significantly affected by the initial fuel temperature and pressure difference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By introducing adiabatic flow assumption into the isothermal injector calculation model, the local fuel temperature variation along the flow direction in the injector was calculated. [18][19][20] Results showed significant changes in fuel temperature across some injector restrictions, and thermal effects also influenced the injection rate and duration. Bae et al 21 experimentally analyzed the influence of fuel temperature on the transient needle movement and fuel injection speed, and the researchers believed that the increase of fuel temperature would lead to a reduced injection duration and fuel injection speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%