2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-009-9587-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Evolution and Magnetic Field Generation in Terrestrial Planets and Satellites

Abstract: Of the terrestrial planets, Earth and Mercury have self-sustained fields while Mars and Venus do not. Magnetic field data recorded at Ganymede have been interpreted as evidence of a self-generated magnetic field. The other icy Galilean satellites have magnetic fields induced in their subsurface oceans while Io and the Saturnian satellite Titan apparently are lacking magnetic fields of internal origin altogether.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 252 publications
(308 reference statements)
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 16 shows the CMB heat flux patterns resulting from an impactor of 800 km radius falling on the north pole (left) or the equator (right) of Mars' surface. Because it is thought that there is no inner core in Mars (Breuer et al 2010;Schubert and Spohn 1990), purely thermal convection was modeled, with a volumetric homogeneous heat source that compensated for the loss of heat through the outer boundary (Amit et al 2011a;Dietrich and Wicht 2013). A small inner core corresponding to r i /r o = 0.2 was retained to avoid numerical instabilities, but the inner boundary was set to be convectively passive (Table 1).…”
Section: Localized Mantle Heating and The Paleo Dynamo Of Marsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 16 shows the CMB heat flux patterns resulting from an impactor of 800 km radius falling on the north pole (left) or the equator (right) of Mars' surface. Because it is thought that there is no inner core in Mars (Breuer et al 2010;Schubert and Spohn 1990), purely thermal convection was modeled, with a volumetric homogeneous heat source that compensated for the loss of heat through the outer boundary (Amit et al 2011a;Dietrich and Wicht 2013). A small inner core corresponding to r i /r o = 0.2 was retained to avoid numerical instabilities, but the inner boundary was set to be convectively passive (Table 1).…”
Section: Localized Mantle Heating and The Paleo Dynamo Of Marsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breuer et al (2010), summarizing earlier suggestions (Stevenson 1983), note that saturation of metal in light elements might occur at the lower pressures of a magma ocean that might later exsolve from the metal due to oversaturation at higher pressures after the metal segregates to form the core. Flow of exsolved material upwards in the core could drive a dynamo, which Hirose et al (2017) show that it is quite efficient and possibly operates the present-day Earth's.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…It appears more difficult to do this with geostrophic flows ( ν CIA ) because the required heat flows are too large: 100-1000 times the present-day estimates. Convection models for the evolution of heat flow of Mars (Breuer et al 2010) show that heat flows high enough to run a magnetostrophic mantle dynamo existed between 0-1 Gyr after accretion ended, which would provide the required heat flow increase in the time frame for the dynamo's existence. It therefore seems possible that the earliest-surviving crust in the magma ocean phase of planetary evolution could record a magnetic field generated by a mantle dynamo, independent of whether a core dynamo was also operating.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations