1964
DOI: 10.1038/203058a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Expansion of Pyrolytic Graphite and its Variation due to Non-Alignment of the Crystallites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the same interatomic potentials for both the sample preparation and thermal-conductivity calculations, as shown in next section. Because an annealing temperature of ∼3000 K is in the range of the optimal temperature for singlecrystal graphite, 30 we then performed MD simulations at a temperature of ∼3000 K and a pressure of ∼0 under an isothermal−isobaric ensemble. A high annealing temperature is favorable because it increases the atomic kinetic energy, makes it easier to overcome the energy barrier, and causes equilibrium positions to be reached more quickly.…”
Section: Model and Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the same interatomic potentials for both the sample preparation and thermal-conductivity calculations, as shown in next section. Because an annealing temperature of ∼3000 K is in the range of the optimal temperature for singlecrystal graphite, 30 we then performed MD simulations at a temperature of ∼3000 K and a pressure of ∼0 under an isothermal−isobaric ensemble. A high annealing temperature is favorable because it increases the atomic kinetic energy, makes it easier to overcome the energy barrier, and causes equilibrium positions to be reached more quickly.…”
Section: Model and Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%