2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02119.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal growth performance of juvenile brown troutSalmo trutta: no support for thermal adaptation hypotheses

Abstract: Using thermal growth data from eight populations of anadromous and lake-feeding brown trout Salmo trutta, hypotheses of adaptation to local optima and countergradient variation in growth were tested. The adaptation to local optima hypothesis suggests that natural selection can shift optimal performance temperatures to match the prevailing temperature in a new or changed thermal niche. In contradiction, the countergradient variation hypothesis suggests that populations from hostile environments perform better t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
80
2
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
80
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Although temperature exerts pronounced effects on physical processes in poikilotherms (e.g., Wootton 1998), we found no implications suggesting that water temperature modified the effect of presence of Arctic char on brown trout food consumption. This corresponds to previous findings of only minor difference in thermal performance between Arctic char and brown trout (Larsson 2005;Forseth et al 2009;Elliott and Elliott 2010;Finstad et al 2011). Change in temperature per se is therefore not likely to alter the competitive outcome between Arctic char and brown trout directly through water temperature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Although temperature exerts pronounced effects on physical processes in poikilotherms (e.g., Wootton 1998), we found no implications suggesting that water temperature modified the effect of presence of Arctic char on brown trout food consumption. This corresponds to previous findings of only minor difference in thermal performance between Arctic char and brown trout (Larsson 2005;Forseth et al 2009;Elliott and Elliott 2010;Finstad et al 2011). Change in temperature per se is therefore not likely to alter the competitive outcome between Arctic char and brown trout directly through water temperature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, this seems less likely as adaptations to different temperatures seem to be uncommon in several northern salmonid species (e.g. Larsson et al, 2005;Larsson & Berglund, 2006;Forseth et al, 2009). Unfortunately, we did not take blood samples during the initial period of the experiment when most of the problems related to negative SGR and high mortality occurred in the whitefish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Fish that died during the experiment (19 out of 480) were replaced by similarly sized fish to maintain densities at 10 fish per tank, but the replacement fish were not included in the results. The setup of the growth performance experiments followed a well-documented and standardized protocol (Jonsson et al 2001, Finstad et al 2004, Larsson et al 2005, Forseth et al 2009). Mean mass (± SD) of the fish at start of the first growth experiment run was 6.2 ± 1.2, 9.0 ± 1.4, and 12.1 ± 2.2 g for natural, mixed and heated incubation temperatures, respectively, and 9.4 ± 2.4, 11.6 ± 2.5, and 14.7 ± 3.1 g for the second.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%