1985
DOI: 10.1097/00004630-198511000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Injury in the Elderly: Incidence and Cause

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with previous studies. 33 37 Consistent with previous studies, 38 – 43 flame burns were the most common cause of burn injury in the younger adult population (aged 18–64 years) whereas the proportion of scald injuries increased in older age groups. This mechanism of injury is consistent with the finding that many burns in older adults are sustained during cooking and bathing, 44 as well as spills involving hot drinks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This finding is consistent with previous studies. 33 37 Consistent with previous studies, 38 – 43 flame burns were the most common cause of burn injury in the younger adult population (aged 18–64 years) whereas the proportion of scald injuries increased in older age groups. This mechanism of injury is consistent with the finding that many burns in older adults are sustained during cooking and bathing, 44 as well as spills involving hot drinks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The elderly have several characteristics that place them at risk for sustaining a burn injury: slower reaction times make them less able to a burn; they often live alone; and their skin atrophies and has a thinner dermal layer, placing them at risk for sustaining a full-thickness burn with a shorter exposure to the burning agent [22,26]. Kravitz et al [35] found that the elderly were more likely to be burned by flame (60% of the time) followed by scalds (16%), contact with hot object (6%), and contact with electricity (3%). The fatality rate for the person 70 years or older is three times that of the national average.…”
Section: Elderly Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1998, 236,200 patients were treated in emergency departments for chemical burns; however, only 2% were admitted to the hospital, mostly because appropriate emergent measures were administered to remove the chemical agent. Chemical burns averaged approximately 2 days lost from work [3,35,45]. Occupations at risk for chemical burns are jobs working with strong acids (fertilizer manufactures), strong alkalis (soap manufacturers), and hydrofluoric acid (petroleum refiners and air conditioner cleaners).…”
Section: Occupationmentioning
confidence: 99%