1998
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0787:tmsoai>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal-metamorphic signature of an impact event in the Vredefort dome, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hydrothermal effects may have resulted in formation/ destruction of magnetic minerals and changes in grain size and domain state of magnetic carriers. Hydrothermal activity has been documented in impact craters (e.g., Allen et al 1982;Ames et al 1998;Gibson et al 1998). Detailed observations on magnetic mineralogy and hydrothermal minerals in the breccias are needed for interpretation of the paleomagnetic data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrothermal effects may have resulted in formation/ destruction of magnetic minerals and changes in grain size and domain state of magnetic carriers. Hydrothermal activity has been documented in impact craters (e.g., Allen et al 1982;Ames et al 1998;Gibson et al 1998). Detailed observations on magnetic mineralogy and hydrothermal minerals in the breccias are needed for interpretation of the paleomagnetic data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Vredefort dome is ~80 km in diameter, and comprises a 40 km diameter Archean core of deep crustal rocks, surrounded by an annular collar of mid-crustal rocks [Gibson et al, 1998;Lana et al, 2003]. Hence, observations at both Sudbury and Vredefort suggest that there is a large amount of structural uplift in the central zone, and that the amount of structural uplift decreases outwards.…”
Section: Grieve and Pilkingtonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2b is inconsistent with observations at two similar-sized large terrestrial craters: Vredefort and Sudbury. The Vredefort dome is ~80 km wide, and comprises a 40 km diameter Archean core of deep crustal rocks surrounded by an annular collar of mid-crustal rocks [Gibson et al, 1998;Lana et al, 2003]. At Sudbury there is also a decrease in metamorphic grade with distance from the Sudbury Igneous Complex (SIC) [Riller, 2005;Grieve et al, 2008].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erosion has removed the coherent impact-melt sheet and has been estimated to be in the range of 5 to 10 km (McCarthy et al 1990;Gibson et al 1998;Gibson and Reimold 2001). Kamo et al (1996) determined a U-Pb age from zircons in the granophyre and pseudotachylitic breccia of ~2020 Ma, which has been confirmed by more recent results, for the age of the Vredefort impact event.…”
Section: Vredefort South Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They further suggested that the pervasive network of veins of pseudotachylitic breccia may have provided the means for large-scale continuous rock flow during structural uplift. The originally deepest rocks of the crystalline core of the Vredefort Dome are from mid-crustal levels (Lana et al 2003), and there is a progressive increase in recorded postimpact temperatures from ~300 °C in the outer collar rocks to >700 °C, and locally as high as 1000 °C, in the central core due to the geothermal gradient prior to impact-induced uplift and shock heating (Gibson et al 1998;Gibson 2002;Gibson and Reimold 2005). These high temperatures may have also assisted in mechanical strength degradation during structural uplift and modification.…”
Section: Vredefort South Africamentioning
confidence: 99%