2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00710-011-0151-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal microstructural changes of grain-supported limestones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences could be explained while exploring the other parameters such as influence of trace elements content, raw materials characterization and OBM cutting behaviour. Many studies [54][55][56][57][58] have reported the limestone reactivity and linked it to the calcite structure. Different grain sizes [59] and impurities within the limestone can cause variations in the limestone's textural and mineralogical properties, and subsequently influence the calcination temperature [60].…”
Section: Fig 3 Xrd Patterns Of the Prepared Clinkermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences could be explained while exploring the other parameters such as influence of trace elements content, raw materials characterization and OBM cutting behaviour. Many studies [54][55][56][57][58] have reported the limestone reactivity and linked it to the calcite structure. Different grain sizes [59] and impurities within the limestone can cause variations in the limestone's textural and mineralogical properties, and subsequently influence the calcination temperature [60].…”
Section: Fig 3 Xrd Patterns Of the Prepared Clinkermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The firing conditions applied in the industrial lime kilns affect the quicklime reactivity. Soltan et al (2011) found that highly reactive lime can result from different soaking times after firing at 950uC, based on the microstructure of the starting material. The crystalline phases, such as periclase, developed during the limestone calcination, retard the rate of hydration temperature (Gheevarhese et al, 2002;Potgieter et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific surface area and porosity increase in the quicklime when compared with the limestone before calcination (Paolo, 2002;Trikkel and Kuusik, 2003). Soltan et al (2011) found that the amount of pores is not the main variable for increasing the lime reactivity, but it is the shape of pores. The lime enriched in the contraction fracture micropores is of higher reactivity when compared with the lime enriched with the preserved intraparticle pores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When calcined, the grain-supported limestone, enriched with fossils, produces better lime quality than the mud-supported, dominated by micrite (Soltan et al, 2011a(Soltan et al, , 2011b. This is mainly due to the microstructural Geology Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt *Corresponding author, email abdelmonemsoltan@gmail.com behaviour of the limestones during calcination (Soltan and Serry, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limestone type affects the quality of the produced lime. When calcined, the grain-supported limestone, enriched with fossils, produces better lime quality than the mud-supported, dominated by micrite (Soltan et al, 2011a(Soltan et al, , 2011b. This is mainly due to the microstructural behaviour of the limestones during calcination (Soltan and Serry, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%