1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(01)90217-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal model of capillary electrophoresis and a method for counteracting thermal band broadening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
125
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
125
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat produced in the preparative DFGF device will increase proportionally with the applied electric field strength. Uncontrolled Joule heating leads to an autothermal effect [14] which would eventually boil the buffer [15], and cause arcing in the separation chamber. Heating will also denature proteins [7], robbing them of function.…”
Section: Preparative Dfgf Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat produced in the preparative DFGF device will increase proportionally with the applied electric field strength. Uncontrolled Joule heating leads to an autothermal effect [14] which would eventually boil the buffer [15], and cause arcing in the separation chamber. Heating will also denature proteins [7], robbing them of function.…”
Section: Preparative Dfgf Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal was to flatten the hydrodynamic velocity profile by opposing a laminar flow with a second laminar flow. Later, Gobie and Ivory [2] proposed to counter the thermally induced parabolic profile of the electrically driven migration with an opposing Poiseuille flow. Kok [3] suggested to apply a compensating pressure on the outlet end of the separation capillary to eliminate the effect of a band-broadening source introduced by the voltage decoupler into a separation capillary.…”
Section: Application Of Counterflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the important influence of injection time on R s , N Fe(II) and N Ni(II) indicates that the dispersion effects due to the injected sample volume will be predominant. On the other hand, the dependence of the Ni(II) efficiency on the applied voltage can be explained if dominant diffusion effects are assumed at low voltages (higher migration time and diffusion) and Taylor dispersion due to the Joule effect [27,28] is assumed at high voltages. When the injection time is increased, these effects stop being predominant.…”
Section: Gold Processing Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%