2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2018.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal performance comparison of three sensible heat thermal energy storage systems during charging cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R. Lugolole et al suggests granite pebbles as the filler for an experimental packed bed setup in which the HTF is sunflower oil. Their results are in agreement with previous studies confirming good thermal performance due to high specific heat capacity and low viscosity at high temperatures, which is beneficial for the ease of circulation [9]. Furthermore, Mawire A. published experimental results of the performance of sunflower oil as both a heat storage medium and heat transfer fluid, reporting that high temperature charging resulted in high energy and exergy, but faster heat loss and low heat retention [10].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…R. Lugolole et al suggests granite pebbles as the filler for an experimental packed bed setup in which the HTF is sunflower oil. Their results are in agreement with previous studies confirming good thermal performance due to high specific heat capacity and low viscosity at high temperatures, which is beneficial for the ease of circulation [9]. Furthermore, Mawire A. published experimental results of the performance of sunflower oil as both a heat storage medium and heat transfer fluid, reporting that high temperature charging resulted in high energy and exergy, but faster heat loss and low heat retention [10].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Sensible heat storage using pebbles of two different sizes with sunflower oil, shell thermia B and shell thermia C, as heat transfer fluids was reported. 67 Granite rock pebbles with average diameters of 10.5 and 31.9 mm were used as small pebbles and big pebbles, respectively. The charging behavior of pebble bed heat storage system were reported as shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Solar Heat Storage In Packed Bedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been reported experimentally and numerically on air-packed bed thermal storage systems. [17][18][19][20] Lugolole et al 21 experimentally investigated three sensible storage systems having the same geometrical configurations. Two rock bed storage systems having a particle size of 10.5 and 31.9 mm, respectively, were used as a packing material and sunflower oil as heat transfer fluid (HTF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%