2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.11.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal performance of wavy fin in a compact heat exchanger duct using Galerkin method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research 43,44 describes an extensive proof of this method. The governing equations are transformed into weak forms and discretized using the Galerkin finite element method 45–48 . The analysis is based on an error estimate of less than 10 −6 to provide accurate and reliable results.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research 43,44 describes an extensive proof of this method. The governing equations are transformed into weak forms and discretized using the Galerkin finite element method 45–48 . The analysis is based on an error estimate of less than 10 −6 to provide accurate and reliable results.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They verified that the Nusselt number increased with the increase of amplitude and ripple number. By comparing the heat transfer rate, surface emissivity and convection coefficient under different fin geometry parameters, Arash Mahdavi [19] analyzed the heat transfer in the compact heat exchanger pipe, and verified that the heat transfer rate can significantly increase the heat transfer coefficient. Gun Woo Kim [20] conducted a numerical study on the optimal cross section length of the fin heat exchanger with different corrugated angles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although many research studies have been devoted to find the analytical solutions of fins problems (Abbasbandy and Shivanian, 2017; Abbasbandy and Shivanian, 2018; Kader et al , 2016; Moitsheki et al , 2010; Popovych et al , 2008), the complexity of these solutions and the limitations of applying them in engineering problems have increased the importance of using semi-analytical and numerical methods for solving these types of problems. The Adomian decomposition method (ADM) (Chiu, 2002; Singla and Das, 2014; Arslanturk, 2005; Roy et al , 2015; Wazwaz et al , 2016), variational iteration method (VIM) (Coşkun and Atay, 2008; Wazwaz, 2017), homotopy perturbation method (HPM) (Rajabi, 2007; Cuce and Cuce, 2015), homotopy analysis method (HAM) (Panda et al , 2014; Inc, 2008; Domairry and Fazeli, 2009; Shivanian and Ghoncheh, 2017), differential transformation method (Joneidi et al , 2009), least squares method (Aziz and Bouaziz, 2011), Galerkin method (Mahdavi and Delavar, 2018), linear barycentric rational interpolation method (Torkaman et al , 2019) and Haar wavelet quasilinearization method (Aznam et al , 2019) have been recently used to solve several nonlinear heat transfer problems related to fins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%