Comprehensive Nuclear Materials 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-803581-8.11726-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Properties of Irradiated UO2 and MOX

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results at the end of the simulations are compared in Figure 11. As it is noticeable, the configuration considering the migration of the porosity induced by cracks 5 yields results that are closer to the experimental data then the one 4 It is worth to notice that one can in principle choose a different number of fragments and a different angle to model the cracking pattern. In this case, the thickness of the crack would need to be adjusted to preserve the total free volume.…”
Section: Preliminary Assessment Against Experimental Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results at the end of the simulations are compared in Figure 11. As it is noticeable, the configuration considering the migration of the porosity induced by cracks 5 yields results that are closer to the experimental data then the one 4 It is worth to notice that one can in principle choose a different number of fragments and a different angle to model the cracking pattern. In this case, the thickness of the crack would need to be adjusted to preserve the total free volume.…”
Section: Preliminary Assessment Against Experimental Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…with straight, radial cracks. As for the crack thickness, we consider that the 8 fragments are fully displaced and in contact with the cladding, thus the initial internal void surface/volume due to the gap is conserved and transfered into the cracks 4 For both configurations, conforming and a priori refined first order triangular elements are used (see details in AppendixB). The results at the end of the simulations are compared in Figure 11.…”
Section: Preliminary Assessment Against Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, A can be represented as A = A 0 + ∑ i x i A i ′ , where the summation is over defects i , x i is the concentration of defect i , A i ′ is the scattering parameter for defect i , and A 0 is the residual value for a pristine material. , Recommended values of A 0 and B for pristine samples of UO 2 , ThO 2 , and CeO 2 are summarized in Table , and representative conductivity profiles as functions of temperature are shown in Figure . The simplified formulation and minor variations thereof have been used to describe the thermal conductivity of fresh and irradiated UO 2 fuel, , mixed uranium–plutonium dioxide (MOX) fuel, and rare-earth-doped UO 2 …”
Section: Thermal Conductivity Under Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 99%