2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-34023-9_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Properties of Rocks and Density of Fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
4
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such stratified model is consistent with the geological characteristics revealed by the exploratory well EAC-1, which intersected~1100 m of the meta-sedimentary and plutonic basement and the entire caldera sequence (~900 m). Thermal properties of rocks were taken from literature (Eppelbaum et al, 2014 and references therein), but volumetric mass density was measured in core and surface samples through the water displacement method (Table 1). Besides, the model assumes fixed temperature boundary conditions of 15°C at the surface and of 750°C at a depth of 4000 m bgs; the former value corresponds to the annual average temperature of the region (Peláez Pavón, 2015), whereas the latter is the presumed temperature of the heat source considered as a silicic magma (e.g.…”
Section: Modeling Constraints Experimental Data and Computational Mementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such stratified model is consistent with the geological characteristics revealed by the exploratory well EAC-1, which intersected~1100 m of the meta-sedimentary and plutonic basement and the entire caldera sequence (~900 m). Thermal properties of rocks were taken from literature (Eppelbaum et al, 2014 and references therein), but volumetric mass density was measured in core and surface samples through the water displacement method (Table 1). Besides, the model assumes fixed temperature boundary conditions of 15°C at the surface and of 750°C at a depth of 4000 m bgs; the former value corresponds to the annual average temperature of the region (Peláez Pavón, 2015), whereas the latter is the presumed temperature of the heat source considered as a silicic magma (e.g.…”
Section: Modeling Constraints Experimental Data and Computational Mementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minerals that can be also expected in the basaltic dust such as olivines and pyroxenes all are characterised by higher thermal conductivities (3.16-5.03 J m À1 K À1 s À1 ). The average value for basalt is 2.11 J m À1 K À1 s À1 (Eppelbaum et al, 2014) and varies between 1.12 and 2.38 J m À1 K À1 s À1 (Sharma, 2002) where the lowest values are due to high porosity and low saturation which is not expected in dust-sized grains. For a monolayer of dust heat is efficiently transferred through every grain, and such small differences in thermal conductivity do not influence the outcome.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity (K D )mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…comparable elevation along the present-day topography crossing the fold. Indeed, clays have commonly lower thermal conductivity than carbonates (Eppelbaum, Kutasov, & Pilchin, 2014). during the Atlas II tectonic event.…”
Section: Maximum Burial Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%