2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2004.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal radiative fluxes through inhomogeneous cloud fields: a sensitivity study using a new stochastic cloud generator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For scales smaller than the inertial domain, viscosity phenomena smooth and homogenize the fluid movement and the spectral energy is no longer correlated with the wave number (Benassi et al, 2004). The limit is not clearly defined because of limitations due to instrument resolution.…”
Section: Scale Invariant Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For scales smaller than the inertial domain, viscosity phenomena smooth and homogenize the fluid movement and the spectral energy is no longer correlated with the wave number (Benassi et al, 2004). The limit is not clearly defined because of limitations due to instrument resolution.…”
Section: Scale Invariant Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microphysical quantities such as liquid water content (LWC) or ice water content (IWC), optical quantities such as extinction coefficient, or radiative field quantities such as radiances, reflectances and brightness temperatures are not randomly distributed from small to large scales but often follow a power law in Fourier space (Benassi et al, 2004;Cahalan and Snider, 1989;Davis et al, 1994Davis et al, , 1996Davis et al, 1997;Fauchez et al, 2014, etc.). Indeed, Kolmogorov theory (Kolmogorov, 1941) shows that in the inertial domain, where the turbulence is isotropic, and at the equilibrium with large scales, spectral energy as a function of the wave number k is described by a power law spectrum E(k) with an exponent β ∼ −5/3 named spectral slope.…”
Section: Scale Invariant Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale invariant properties observed in real clouds can be controlled. The power spectra of the logarithm of their optical properties (optical depth, liquid water content or liquid water path for low clouds and ice water content for high clouds) typically exhibits a spectral slope of around −5/3 (Davis et al, 1994(Davis et al, , 1996(Davis et al, , 1997(Davis et al, , 1999Cahalan et al, 1994;Benassi et al, 2004;Hogan and Kew, 2005;Hill et al, 2012;Fauchez et al, 2014) from small scale (a few metres) to the "integral scale" or the outer scale (few tenths of a kilometre to one-hundred kilometres), where the spectrum becomes flat (i.e. decorrelation occurs).…”
Section: F Szczap Et Al: a Flexible Three-dimensional Cloud Generatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of these types of cloud models are: the bounded cascade model Marshak et al, 1998), the iterative amplitude adapted Fourier transform (IAAFT) algorithm (Venema et al, 2006), the SITCOM model (Di Guiseppe and Thompkins, 2003), the tree-driven mass accumulation process (tdMAP) model (Benassi et al, 2004), the model developed by Evans and Wiscombe (2004) for low liquid clouds (stratocumulus and cumulus) or by Alexandrov et al (2010) and the Cloudgen model (Hogan and Kew, 2005) for high ice clouds (cirrus). These stochastic models are based on fractal or Fourier framework.…”
Section: F Szczap Et Al: a Flexible Three-dimensional Cloud Generatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from cuboidal cloud geometries were extended in Masunaga and Nakajima (2001) by relaxing the blackbody assumption and addressing how optical thickness influences the effective cloud fraction. Benassi et al (2004) further extended these studies by using realistic cloud structures, broken or not, that were generated with a data-driven stochastic cloud model to compute the MD thermal radiative transfer. Scattering effects in the longwave have traditionally been thought to play only a minor role compared to absorption, and in a study of the relative contributions of cloud geometry and scattering Takara and Ellingson (1996) concluded that MD effects of cloud geometry indeed dominate over scattering.…”
Section: ϫ2mentioning
confidence: 99%