1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02508538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal regime of laser ablation of metals by ultrashort pulses of low fluence

Abstract: Thermal ablation of a metal surface by low-energy ultrashort laser pulses is considered theoretically. The temporal dynamics of the surface electron and lattice temperatures is studied within the framework of the two-temperature model and for different temperature dependences of the characteristics of the metal (electron-relaxation time, heat capacity, thermal conductivity). The approximation of evaporation into a vacuum is used to determine the ablation depth. Analytical expressions for the ablation-threshold… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 experimental data for ablation of Cu [12] by 150-fs laser pulses are compared with the results of our calculations (Z = 1 and Tcr --0.465 eV). The experimental value of the threshold fluence F~: u) = 200 mJ/cm 2 is also close to the results of both computer simulation on the basis of the model under consideration and analytical model [3].…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Datasupporting
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…5 experimental data for ablation of Cu [12] by 150-fs laser pulses are compared with the results of our calculations (Z = 1 and Tcr --0.465 eV). The experimental value of the threshold fluence F~: u) = 200 mJ/cm 2 is also close to the results of both computer simulation on the basis of the model under consideration and analytical model [3].…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Datasupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The results are in good agreement and correspond to the threshold fluence F (Au) -~ 100 mJ/cm 2. It should be noted that this value is close to the analytical value of 90 mJ/cm 2 obtained within the framework of the surface evaporation model [3], i.e., the predictions of both models do not contradict experimental data.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Datasupporting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations