2017
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal requirements for growth, survival and aerobic performance of weatherfish larvae Misgurnus fossilis

Abstract: Thermal requirements of larval weatherfish Misgurnus fossilis were investigated in terms of growth, survival and aerobic performance. Growth and survival of M. fossilis larvae acclimated to five temperatures (11, 15, 19, 23 and 27° C) were measured over 25 days. In the upper temperature treatments (19, 23 and 27° C), survival of larvae was stable throughout the entire rearing period (>75%), whereas 11 and 15° C resulted in severe declines in survival (to <10%). Growth of larvae (expressed as dry mass and total… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the fact that VO2 values are generally highly variable and are mostly presented as logarithmically transformed values, we consider those values to correspond nicely. Our fish were too large and methods were too different for making meaningful comparisons with measurements on early larval European weatherfish by Schreiber et al (2017), or those for Oriental weatherfish by White et al (2017). We observed a negative trend in VO2 per gram wet mass with increasing body mass, which is a well -known pattern in the early ontogeny of larval and juvenile fish (Chabot et al 2016) and reflects lower weight-specific metabolic rates with increasing body mass as the scaling exponent between oxygen consumption and mass is typically lower than one (Clarke and Johnston 1999;Isaac and Carbone 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Given the fact that VO2 values are generally highly variable and are mostly presented as logarithmically transformed values, we consider those values to correspond nicely. Our fish were too large and methods were too different for making meaningful comparisons with measurements on early larval European weatherfish by Schreiber et al (2017), or those for Oriental weatherfish by White et al (2017). We observed a negative trend in VO2 per gram wet mass with increasing body mass, which is a well -known pattern in the early ontogeny of larval and juvenile fish (Chabot et al 2016) and reflects lower weight-specific metabolic rates with increasing body mass as the scaling exponent between oxygen consumption and mass is typically lower than one (Clarke and Johnston 1999;Isaac and Carbone 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Subsequently, individuals from different populations origin were maintained separately. Artificial propagation followed the procedure reported by Schreiber et al (2017b). In brief, males and females were isolated from each other, and water temperature was gradually increased to 18°C, before a gonadotropinreleasing hormone (GnRH) containing preparation (Ovopel, Unic-trade) was intramuscularly injected in two divided doses.…”
Section: Captive Breeding and Rearing Of Fishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good feasibility of weatherfish production was previously reported in several studies (Kouril et al, 1996;Demény et al, 2009). However, comprehensive investigations on the thermal requirements of weatherfish larvae carried out along with the program helped to increase their survival and growth rates during the rearing period (Schreiber et al, 2017b). This illustrates how scientific guidance of different steps in comparable conservation programs may improve the prospects and hence is explicitly recommended.…”
Section: Catchmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of weatherfish, these data are still largely lacking. There are few published studies on the biology of M. fossilis, with limited focus on threats and protection (Hartvich et al 2010;Freyhof and Brooks 2011;Schreiber et al 2018a), habitat preferences (Meyer and Hinrichs 2000;, reproduction (Geldhauser 1992;Adamkova-Stibranyiova et al 1999;Drozd et al 2009;Schreiber et al 2017a;Pyrzanowski et al 2021 in press), growth (Pyrzanowski et al 2020b), and morphology (Kotusz 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%