2017 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC EUROPE 2017
DOI: 10.1109/emceurope.2017.8094719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal risks due to land vehicle radioelectric exposure: Results of Thales research and study for military purpose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess whether such intensity values would induce SAR and E-field values inside the body that exceed the BRs, the presence of the military operator, partially standing outside the vehicle, through a manhole, in close proximity to the radiating monopole, was considered. As a first step, the unequipped operator was modeled (scenario b) similarly to what was done in other dosimetric studies (3,21). The induced Efield inside the body was estimated to be up to 12 V/m, leading to SAR wb and a peak SAR 10Avg in the order of 10 −3 mW/kg, well below the limits of 0.4 and 10 W/kg, respectively (6, 7, 9), thus finding that noncompliant E-field induced compliant SAR wb and peak SAR 10Avg , as also found by Alcaras and colleagues in 2017, under similar exposure condition (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess whether such intensity values would induce SAR and E-field values inside the body that exceed the BRs, the presence of the military operator, partially standing outside the vehicle, through a manhole, in close proximity to the radiating monopole, was considered. As a first step, the unequipped operator was modeled (scenario b) similarly to what was done in other dosimetric studies (3,21). The induced Efield inside the body was estimated to be up to 12 V/m, leading to SAR wb and a peak SAR 10Avg in the order of 10 −3 mW/kg, well below the limits of 0.4 and 10 W/kg, respectively (6, 7, 9), thus finding that noncompliant E-field induced compliant SAR wb and peak SAR 10Avg , as also found by Alcaras and colleagues in 2017, under similar exposure condition (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher E-Field value probably influenced by the factors such as the antennas distances to personnel position, vehicle dimensions, windows, material, and ground surrounding [6,7]. Others study on military vehicle RF radiation levels carried out by Alcaras and Frere [8] shown the E-Field results range 1200 V/m from the 125 W HF transmission and 200 V/m from 50 W VHF transmission respectively. The RF radiations levels were measured 1 m from both antennas.…”
Section: Total Exposure Assessment -Hf and Vhf Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%