2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2012.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal sensation at index finger while applying external pressure at upper arm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, a similar frequency distribution analysis of thermal ratings has been previously reported in the literature (24). In line with Gan et al (24) and with our previous findings (18), we believe that, because of the variable nature of subjective responses, reorganizing the collected data in this format would make the potential differences in the regional distribution of wetness perception across the torso easier to identify.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Also, a similar frequency distribution analysis of thermal ratings has been previously reported in the literature (24). In line with Gan et al (24) and with our previous findings (18), we believe that, because of the variable nature of subjective responses, reorganizing the collected data in this format would make the potential differences in the regional distribution of wetness perception across the torso easier to identify.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…"dry") was considered as representing no perception of wetness ("dry"). At this point, the frequency of times the same cold-dry stimulus was perceived as "dry" or as "wet" was calculated and analysed by a Chi-square test.A similar frequency distribution analysis of thermal ratings has been previously reported in the literature (see Gan et al 2012 (thermo-neutral exercise) and 33.6 ± 0.2°C (Warm rest) for the upper back, and between 27 ± 0.2°C (thermo-neutral exercise) and 32.1 ± 0.2°C (Warm rest) for the lower back. Average ∆Tsk from pre-to post-stimulation (as a result of each of the six stimuli, applied to each skin site, during each of the four experimental conditions), were calculated and found to be normally distributed (p >0.05).…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…A similar frequency distribution analysis of thermal ratings has been previously reported in the literature (see Gan et al 2012 Baseline thermal sensation scores (pre-stimulation) were respectively: -1.1 ± 0.1 (thermo-neutral rest); +0.9 ± 0.1 (Warm rest); +0.7 ± 0.1 (thermo-neutral exercise);…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…S3b). This is in contrast with the subject F3 and indicates inter-subject variation of the peripheral skin blood flow and associated temperature profile which is well documented in literature [22,37] and can be attributed to subject-to-subject variations in skin thickness, fat-content and peripheral venous resistance among various other interconnected parameters. The variation of DT as a function of time for the stimulated as well as the nonstimulated hand for the subject M8 after withdrawal of the cold stress is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Error Estimation and Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 67%