2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.05.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal shock resistance of magnesia–chrome refractories—experimental and criterial evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was reported that value-added forsterite refractory materials ($1100–1300/t) could be produced using high-magnesia and silica waste as raw materials, including ferrochromium slag, iron ore tailing and amorphous rice husk, after properly altering their chemical compositions at 1500–1650 °C for 3–6 h. Hence it may be feasible to prepare forsterite refractory materials by a similar approach from ferronickel slag despite the lack of relevant report in literature. Furthermore, the relatively high chromium content in the ferronickel slag may serve as an advantageous factor for preparation of refractory material as the Cr­(III) contained in ferronickel slag can be stabilized in the high melting point spinel phase without leachability during the refractory material sintering process. This strategy will not only solve the potential chromium contamination of ferronickel slag in the preparation but also improve the refractoriness of the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that value-added forsterite refractory materials ($1100–1300/t) could be produced using high-magnesia and silica waste as raw materials, including ferrochromium slag, iron ore tailing and amorphous rice husk, after properly altering their chemical compositions at 1500–1650 °C for 3–6 h. Hence it may be feasible to prepare forsterite refractory materials by a similar approach from ferronickel slag despite the lack of relevant report in literature. Furthermore, the relatively high chromium content in the ferronickel slag may serve as an advantageous factor for preparation of refractory material as the Cr­(III) contained in ferronickel slag can be stabilized in the high melting point spinel phase without leachability during the refractory material sintering process. This strategy will not only solve the potential chromium contamination of ferronickel slag in the preparation but also improve the refractoriness of the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the influence of main impurities in the ferronickel slag, such as chromium oxide, on the preparing refractory materials from ferronickel slag was still uncertain although their promoting effect may exist regarding the possibility of formation of Cr-bearing spinel. In fact, refractory materials containing chromium­(III) oxide are featured by excellent corrosion resistance, thermal shock resistance, relatively low cost, and long durability, with wide applications in waste melting furnaces, gasification furnaces, glass tank furnaces, tapping channels, and many other furnaces in ferrous and nonferrous (e.g., copper and lead) metallurgy. It should be mentioned that when chromium is stabilized as Cr­(III) in the spinel phase, it becomes nontoxic. The conversion of Cr­(III) to Cr­(VI) is also restrained when the furnaces are operated in low oxygen atmosphere (<12 vol %) . From these perspectives, the chromium in the ferronickel slag may serve as an advantageous factor for improving the properties of slag-oriented refractory materials although no in-depth relevant study has been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that TSR is an important property, determining the performance of a refractory material under various service conditions (Antonovič et al 2010;Miyaji et al 2014;Mertke, Aneziris 2015;Ribeiro, Rodrigues 2010;Wojsa et al 2013). To determine and forecast it, the values of thermal shock resistance R, R 1 , R 4 and R st are commonly used (Hasselman 1963(Hasselman , 1969Kingery et al 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%