1998
DOI: 10.1021/om9804677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Si−C Bond Cleavage of LRhH(SiAr3)(μ-H)(μ-Cl)RhH(SiAr3)L (Ar = C6H5, C6H4F-p; L = P(i-Pr)3) To Give LRhH(μ-SiAr3)(μ-SiAr2)(μ-Cl)RhHL Containing Symmetrically Bridging Triarylsilyl and Diarylsilylene Ligands

Abstract: The reaction of dinuclear rhodium complex LRhH(SiPh 3 )(µ-H)(µ-Cl)RhH(SiPh 3 )L (1; L ) P(i-Pr) 3 ) with excess HSi(C 6 H 4 F-p) 3 leads to replacement of the SiPh 3 ligands with the Si- 4), respectively. Heating of benzene or toluene solution of 1 and 2 at 60 °C results in Si-C bond cleavage of a triarylsilyl ligand and affords LRhH(µ-SiAr 3 )(µ-SiAr 2 )-(µ-Cl)RhHL (7, Ar ) Ph; 8, Ar ) C 6 H 4 F-p) accompanied by liberation of benzene and fluorobenzene, respectively. The NMR ( 1 H and 31 P) spectra of 7 and 8… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This makes each metal center formally Rh 3+ , consistent with the observed diamagnetism. The Rh−Rh distance is in the range associated with dinuclear rhodium complexes with a metal−metal bond. The two chloride ligands do not span the Rh−Rh vector symmetrically, one Rh−Cl distance in each Rh−Cl−Rh unit being significantly longer than the other: viz., Rh(2)−Cl(1) = 2.538(3) Å and Rh(1)−Cl(1) = 2.416(3) Å. This difference can be traced back to the approximate trans orientation of the terminal hydrides with respect to the chloride ligands (H(2)−Rh(2)-Cl(1) = 168(4)° and H(1)−Rh(1)−Cl(2) = 163(3)°), meaning that each bridging chloride is approximately trans to both a phosphine and a hydride, with a resulting differential in the observed Rh−Cl bond lengths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes each metal center formally Rh 3+ , consistent with the observed diamagnetism. The Rh−Rh distance is in the range associated with dinuclear rhodium complexes with a metal−metal bond. The two chloride ligands do not span the Rh−Rh vector symmetrically, one Rh−Cl distance in each Rh−Cl−Rh unit being significantly longer than the other: viz., Rh(2)−Cl(1) = 2.538(3) Å and Rh(1)−Cl(1) = 2.416(3) Å. This difference can be traced back to the approximate trans orientation of the terminal hydrides with respect to the chloride ligands (H(2)−Rh(2)-Cl(1) = 168(4)° and H(1)−Rh(1)−Cl(2) = 163(3)°), meaning that each bridging chloride is approximately trans to both a phosphine and a hydride, with a resulting differential in the observed Rh−Cl bond lengths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tanaka reported that the dinickel complexes with bridging silylene and silyl ligands have a Si···Si interaction between the ligands . σ-Bond metathesis is not usually suggested as the valid mechanism for the Si–Si bond formation by late transition metals, although it is discussed as a mechanism of the Si–H bond activation in dinuclear Rh complexes with Si ligands . In this paper, we present polycondensation of primary silanes using Ni catalysts to form the cyclic oligosilanes selectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…10 bond activation in dinuclear Rh complexes with Si ligands. 11 In this paper, we present polycondensation of primary silanes using Ni catalysts to form the cyclic oligosilanes selectively.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 227 Additional derivatives with Ar 3− n Ph n SiH: n = 1 or 2, Ar = C 6 H 4 - p -F; n = 0, Ar = C 6 H 4 - p -CF 3 and Ar = C 6 H 4 -4-CH 3 (not isolated). When [L(H)RhSiPh 3 ] 2 (μ-H)(μ-Cl) was treated with 4 equiv of HSiAr 3 (Ar = C 6 H 4 Me- p ), [L(H)RhSiAr 3 ] 2 ( μ -H)(μ-Cl) (12 pts) and [L(H)SiAr 3 Rh](μ-H)(μ- Cl)[RhH(SiPh 3 )L] (44 pts) and 3-216 (44 pts) formed 228 X-ray structure of [L(H)RhSiPh 3 ] 2 (μ-H)(μ-Cl) (L = P( i Pr) 3 ) reported in ref . 229 AAA′ part of AA′MM'XX′ pattern …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%