2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal stability of ESR signals in hydrothermal barites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Okumura et al (2010) made the first practical application of ESR dating technique to a sample of seafloor hydrothermal barite to obtain ages of 300 and 3,620 years, while Kasuya et al (1991) first pointed out that barite can be used for ESR dating. Toyoda et al (2011) determined the optimum ESR condition while Sato et al (2011) confirmed that the signal is thermally stable enough for an age range of several thousand years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Okumura et al (2010) made the first practical application of ESR dating technique to a sample of seafloor hydrothermal barite to obtain ages of 300 and 3,620 years, while Kasuya et al (1991) first pointed out that barite can be used for ESR dating. Toyoda et al (2011) determined the optimum ESR condition while Sato et al (2011) confirmed that the signal is thermally stable enough for an age range of several thousand years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Okumura et al (2010) made the first practical application of ESR dating technique to a sample of seafloor hydrothermal barite to obtain ages of 300 and 3,620 years, while Kasuya et al (1991) first pointed out that barite can be used for ESR dating. Toyoda et al (2011) determined the optimum ESR condition while Sato et al (2011) confirmed that the signal is thermally stable enough for an age range of several thousand years.Seafloor massive sulfide deposits are composed of sulfide minerals such as pyrite, sphalerite, chalcopyrite and galena, and also include sulfate minerals such as anhydrite and barite. The sulfate minerals precipitate by mixing of hydrothermal fluid and seawater, while the sulfide minerals precipitate from the hydrothermal fluid mainly by cooling (Hannington et al 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kasuya et al (1991) investigated the dose responses of the electron spin resonance (ESR) signals observed in natural barite samples and first pointed out that ESR dating of barite is possible. Following Okumura et al (2010), who made the first practical application of ESR dating to a sample of seafloor hydrothermal barite with the signal due to SO 3 -, basic studies on ESR dating of barite were performed by Toyoda et al (2011) for the optimum conditions of ESR measurements of the dating signal, by Sato et al (2011) for the thermal stability of the signal, and by Toyoda et al (2012) for the alpha effectiveness value. Takamasa et al (2013) examined sulfide deposits in the South Mariana Trough sea-floor hydrothermal field to compare the ESR ages obtained for barite and the U-Th ages for sulfide minerals extracted from the same portions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%