2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal stability of surface modified Sm2Co17-type high temperature magnets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al (2004Chen et al ( , 2006 found that a pure Ni film with a best thickness of 15 μm can offer a good protection against oxidation in air at 500°C to a Sm 2 Co 17 -type magnet, preventing it from a considerable magnetic property loss. This result is well consistent with the work of Wang et al (2013), who indicated that the deposition of a ∼20-μm-thick Ni coating sharply decreased the mass gain of Sm( Co bal Fe 0.1 Cu 0.1 Zr 0.033 ) 6.93 magnet exposed for 500 h at 500°C, leading to a loss of the maximum energy product (BH) max from a normal 40.8% for the uncoated magnet down to only 4.0% in the presence of coating. Pragnell et al (2012) reported that the oxidation of a Sm(Co 0.74 Fe 0.1 Cu 0.12 Zr 0.04 ) 8.5 in air at 550°C was significantly suppressed by a 1.5-to 5-μm-thick Pt coating and a paint-like 5-to 10-μm-thick overlay coating containing Ti and Mg oxides, but their processing, composition, and microstructure are not presented in detail.…”
Section: Oxidation Protectionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chen et al (2004Chen et al ( , 2006 found that a pure Ni film with a best thickness of 15 μm can offer a good protection against oxidation in air at 500°C to a Sm 2 Co 17 -type magnet, preventing it from a considerable magnetic property loss. This result is well consistent with the work of Wang et al (2013), who indicated that the deposition of a ∼20-μm-thick Ni coating sharply decreased the mass gain of Sm( Co bal Fe 0.1 Cu 0.1 Zr 0.033 ) 6.93 magnet exposed for 500 h at 500°C, leading to a loss of the maximum energy product (BH) max from a normal 40.8% for the uncoated magnet down to only 4.0% in the presence of coating. Pragnell et al (2012) reported that the oxidation of a Sm(Co 0.74 Fe 0.1 Cu 0.12 Zr 0.04 ) 8.5 in air at 550°C was significantly suppressed by a 1.5-to 5-μm-thick Pt coating and a paint-like 5-to 10-μm-thick overlay coating containing Ti and Mg oxides, but their processing, composition, and microstructure are not presented in detail.…”
Section: Oxidation Protectionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Besides physical reasons (e.g., microstructural defects), chemical variation within the magnets by surface oxidation has been recently proposed to be a decisive (if not an exclusive) factor leading to the collapse of their cellular precipitations structure. Oxidation of the 2:17-type magnets has been investigated by some authors (Chen et al, , 2001Kardelky et al, 2004;Kardelky, (110) Gebert, Gutfleisch, Hoffmann, & Schultz, 2005;Liu & Walmer, 2005;Liu, Marinescu, Vora, Wu, & Harmer, 2009;Mao et al, 2014;Pauw et al, 1997;Pragnell, Williams, & Evans, 2008;Pragnell, Evans, & Williams, 2009;Wang, Zheng, An, Zhang, & Jiang, 2013;Yang et al, 2012Yang et al, , 2013a. The unacceptable coercivity loss may be prevented by adding appropriate surface coatings that can effectively offer oxidation protection to the magnets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these alloys have the disadvantage that a nanometric grain size is required to generate optimal magnetic properties, and this implies the use of drastic and complex processing conditions such as high potential application or the use of non aqueous solvents. [13][14][15][16] The primary way to prepare rare earth-transition metal alloy thin films has been the vacuum deposition by sputtering, being the main drawback of this procedure the difficulty of deposition onto recessed, high aspect substrates and the high cost. Electrodeposition is an alternative way to achieve the same objective with lower cost equipment and higher fabrication rates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common strategy applied to stabilize SmCo NPs is to coat the preformed NPs with a layer of protecting materials to prevent the NPs from fast and deep oxidation. The protective coating material can be a metal (such as Ni or Cr) or an inorganic oxide, but this coating tends to lower magnetic performance of the SmCo NPs due to the large fraction of nonmagnetic contribution from the coating material. Here, we report a new process to prepare SmCo NPs by chemical reduction method and to stabilize these NPs against fast air oxidation by a layer of nitrogen-doped graphitic carbon (NGC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%