2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2218664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal stress measurement in continuous welded rails using the hole-drilling method

Abstract: The absence of expansion joints in Continuous Welded Rail (CWR) has created the need for the railroad industry to determine the in-situ level of thermal stresses so as to prevent train accidents caused by rail buckling in hot weather and by rail breakage in cold weather. The development of non-destructive or semi-destructive methods for determining the level of thermal stresses in rails is today a high research priority.This study explores the known hole-drilling method as a possible solution to this problem. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two rounds of experiments were conducted. 30,31 With the first round, a linear relationship between the longitudinal and the vertical residual stresses at the neutral axis of unconstrained 136RE and 141RE rail sections was established. This calibration was used to establish a protocol in which the longitudinal thermal stress is estimated by subtracting, from the total longitudinal relieved stress, the longitudinal residual component that is, in turn, calculated from the vertical relieved stress.…”
Section: Disruptive Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two rounds of experiments were conducted. 30,31 With the first round, a linear relationship between the longitudinal and the vertical residual stresses at the neutral axis of unconstrained 136RE and 141RE rail sections was established. This calibration was used to establish a protocol in which the longitudinal thermal stress is estimated by subtracting, from the total longitudinal relieved stress, the longitudinal residual component that is, in turn, calculated from the vertical relieved stress.…”
Section: Disruptive Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residual stress measurement techniques can be classified into two categories: destructive and nondestructive methods [5,6]. Destructive methods, such as hole drilling, slicing, or ring coring, facilitate stress release but can cause irreversible damage to the material [7,8]. Recently, nondestructive testing methods, such as X-ray diffraction, digital image correlation, magnetic methods, and ultrasonic methods, have been used widely for detecting residual stress [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring stress is thus an important failure prevention mechanism and it may be classified into semi-destructive and nondestructive evaluation methods. In the former case, which is not the focus of the present work, the most commonly used is the hole-drilling method [11][12][13]. Nondestructive evaluation for stress monitoring has been done more recently with the use of strain gauges [14], which are limited in resolution, and digital image correlation [15,16] which are not viable options for real-time continuous monitoring use, in contrast with the solutions based on ultrasonic information [17][18][19][20] that can be conveniently used for stress estimation as it involves cheap and simple equipment that may operate in a large frequency range depending on the load frequencyband characteristic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%