2015
DOI: 10.1515/ep-2015-0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Vision as a Method of Detection of Deception: A Review of experiences**

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thermography's main advantage over the polygraph is that it is a contact-free technology recording the response of the autonomic nervous system. The average accuracy of lie detection with a thermal camera is 70% but may range between 70% and 90% depending on the experimental scenario of lying (Gołaszewski, Zajac, & Widacki, 2015;Pollina et al, 2006). However, regarding lie detection, in particular, but also about stress and emotions in general, we found incongruent results regarding thermal changes in the nose and forehead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thermography's main advantage over the polygraph is that it is a contact-free technology recording the response of the autonomic nervous system. The average accuracy of lie detection with a thermal camera is 70% but may range between 70% and 90% depending on the experimental scenario of lying (Gołaszewski, Zajac, & Widacki, 2015;Pollina et al, 2006). However, regarding lie detection, in particular, but also about stress and emotions in general, we found incongruent results regarding thermal changes in the nose and forehead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Thermography's main advantage over the polygraph is that it is a contact‐free technology recording the response of the autonomic nervous system. The average accuracy of lie detection with a thermal camera is 70% but may range between 70% and 90% depending on the experimental scenario of lying (Gołaszewski, Zajac, & Widacki, ; Pollina et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the thermographic detection of lies has focused on the study of thermal changes in the face (Abouelenien et al, ; Gołaszewski et al, ; Warmelink et al, ). However, different authors have focused on different parts of the face, or region of interest (ROI), as a key factor to detect the lie by its thermal change: on the periorbital area (Rajoub & Zwiggeelaar, ; Shastri, Tsiamyrtzis, & Pavlidis, ), on the forehead (Zhu, Tsiamyrtzis, & Pavlidis, ), and on the nose (Panasiti et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermography's main advantage over the polygraph is that it is a contact-free technology recording the response of the autonomic nervous system. The average accuracy of lie detection with a thermal camera is 70%, but may range between 70% and 90% depending on the experimental scenario of lying (Gołaszewski, Zajac, & Widacki, 2015;Pollina et al, 2006). Its false alarm rate is also variable, between 20% and 50% (Abouelenien, P erez-Rosas, Burzo, & Mihalcea, 2016;Warmelink et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…А number of modern lie detection researches included thermography analysis of the subjects who spoke the truth or lies. The average accuracy of lie detection using a thermal camera is 70%, but can vary from 70% to 90% depending on lies experimental scenario [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%