2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.100.035423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermalization of hot electrons via interfacial electron-magnon interaction

Abstract: Recent work on layered structures of superconductors (S) or normal metals (N) in contact with ferromagnetic insulators (FI) has shown how the properties of the previous can be strongly affected by the magnetic proximity effect due to the static FI magnetization. Here we show that such structures can also exhibit a new electron thermalization mechanism due to the coupling of electrons with the dynamic magnetization, i.e., magnons in FI. We here study the heat flow between the two systems and find that in thin f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter admit strong nonlinear effects since a new and small energy scale -the superconducting gap -determines properties such as quasiparticle density of states [34][35][36][37]. Recent years have seen an upsurge of activity in this context with several exciting phenomena discussed, experimentally [33,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] as well as theoretically [35][36][37][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. However, the possibility of transport influencing, and even destroying, the superconducting state was not considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter admit strong nonlinear effects since a new and small energy scale -the superconducting gap -determines properties such as quasiparticle density of states [34][35][36][37]. Recent years have seen an upsurge of activity in this context with several exciting phenomena discussed, experimentally [33,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] as well as theoretically [35][36][37][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. However, the possibility of transport influencing, and even destroying, the superconducting state was not considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%