2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2206.02233
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermally corrected masses and freeze-in dark matter: a case study

Abstract: If coupled feebly to the Standard Model bath, a dark matter can evade the severe constraints from the direct search experiments. At the same time, such interactions help produce dark matter via the freeze-in mechanism. The freeze-in scenario becomes more interesting if one also includes the thermal masses of the different particles involved in the dark matter phenomenology. Incorporating such thermal corrections opens up the possibility of dark matter production via forbidden channels that remain kinematically… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DM paradigms exist in the literature attempting to explain the DM's particle nature. Some of the most popular ones are weakly interacting massive particles (WIMP) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], feebly interacting massive particle (FIMP) [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], asymmetric dark matter models [30,31], models with axion or axion-like particle (ALP) DM [32][33][34][35] etc. Although these models can explain the DM relic density of the Universe, their parameter spaces are restricted from different experimental searches.…”
Section: Jhep12(2022)167mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DM paradigms exist in the literature attempting to explain the DM's particle nature. Some of the most popular ones are weakly interacting massive particles (WIMP) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], feebly interacting massive particle (FIMP) [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], asymmetric dark matter models [30,31], models with axion or axion-like particle (ALP) DM [32][33][34][35] etc. Although these models can explain the DM relic density of the Universe, their parameter spaces are restricted from different experimental searches.…”
Section: Jhep12(2022)167mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, any particle that couples in the thermal bath with the primordial plasma is expected to obtain a mass proportional to the temperature of the Universe provided the condition T > m is satisfied[153][154][155]. However, here we are interested in IR freeze-in, where the DM yield becomes important at lower temperature (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%