The Analysis of Burned Human Remains 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-800451-7.00005-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermally Induced Changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical and forensic anthropologists have studied heat-induced modifications for decades in both human and non-human bone [1,2,6,19,25,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. One of the most widely accepted system of classification and definitions used by biological anthropologists is summarized in Symes et al [32] who define the seven characteristic types of thermal fractures: longitudinal, transverse, curvilinear, step, patina, splintering/delamination and burn line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical and forensic anthropologists have studied heat-induced modifications for decades in both human and non-human bone [1,2,6,19,25,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. One of the most widely accepted system of classification and definitions used by biological anthropologists is summarized in Symes et al [32] who define the seven characteristic types of thermal fractures: longitudinal, transverse, curvilinear, step, patina, splintering/delamination and burn line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods compiled by Adams and Byrd () leaned more toward forensic applications, but chapters on ethics (Egana, Turner, Doretti, Bernardi, & Ginarte, ), osteometric sorting (Byrd, ; Byrd & LeGarde, ), X‐ray fluorescence sorting (Perrone, Finlayson, Bartelink, & Dalton, ), epiphyseal sequencing (Schaefer, ), estimating the most likely number of individuals (MLNI) (Adams & Konigsberg, ; Konigsberg & Adams, ), spatial analysis (Herrmann & Devlin, ; Tuller & Hofmeister, ), and recovery methods (Naji et al, ) were of clear utility for bioarchaeologists in the analysis of broken, mixed remains. Schmidt and Symes’ (2015) volume on burned human bone offered commingling‐related methods for fire‐modified remains such as the Bab adh‐Dhra’ EB II–III collection, discussing bone and tooth color changes (Beach, Passalacqua, & Chapman, ; Devlin & Herrmann, ; Ullinger & Sheridan, ), thermal breakdown of bone (DeHaan, ; Schurr, Hayes, & Cook, ; Thompson, ), enamel changes (Mahoney & Miszkiewicz, ; Sandholzer, ; Schmidt, ), and site‐specific reconstructions (Curtin, ; McKinley, ; Schmidt et al, ; Wahl, ). Haglund and Sorg's older edited volumes (1997, 2002) provided several taphonomic considerations for studies of commingling (Correia, ; Darwent & Lyman, ; Galloway, ; Haglund, Connor, & Scott, ; Lyman & Fox, ; Roksandic, ; Saul and Saul, ; Ubelaker, ).…”
Section: Commingling Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schurr et al (2015) use δ 15 N and δ 13 C, the measures of the ratio of stable isotopes, as quantifying factors in the analysis of burned remains. Exposure to burning raises the δ 15 N values and lowers the δ 13 C values (Schurr et al 2015, p. 112-113).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%