2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermo-hydraulic characterization and design optimization of delta-shaped obstacles in solar water heating system using CRITIC-COPRAS approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this investigation, it was observed that ranking of impregnation materials are in descending order as A-5 > Furthermore, the ranking results of the proposed entropy-TOPSIS methodology were compared to those of other common MCDM methodologies to validate its applicability. The ranking results obtained by the entropy-TOPSIS approach were compared with VIKOR (Visekriterijumska optimizacija kompromisno resenjemeaning) [47] , ARAS (Additive ratio assessment) [48] , GRA (Grey relation analysis) [49] , PROMETHEE II (Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation II) [50] , MOORA (Multiple objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis) [51] , COPRAS (Complex proportional assessment) [52] approaches and ranking results are given in Table 8 and Figure 4. Table 8 demonstrates that the alternative A-5 highest of all other alternatives and the alternative A-1 lowest when solved with all the methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this investigation, it was observed that ranking of impregnation materials are in descending order as A-5 > Furthermore, the ranking results of the proposed entropy-TOPSIS methodology were compared to those of other common MCDM methodologies to validate its applicability. The ranking results obtained by the entropy-TOPSIS approach were compared with VIKOR (Visekriterijumska optimizacija kompromisno resenjemeaning) [47] , ARAS (Additive ratio assessment) [48] , GRA (Grey relation analysis) [49] , PROMETHEE II (Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation II) [50] , MOORA (Multiple objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis) [51] , COPRAS (Complex proportional assessment) [52] approaches and ranking results are given in Table 8 and Figure 4. Table 8 demonstrates that the alternative A-5 highest of all other alternatives and the alternative A-1 lowest when solved with all the methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the subjective weighting method, the CRITIC weighting method does not require the decision maker to make a subjective judgment, thus avoiding the possibility of biased results. The steps for calculating indicator weights using the CRITIC method are as follows [30]:…”
Section: Methods For Calculating the Weight Of Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their research took a holistic strategy, combining CRITIC for criterion weight determination and CODAS for overall decision-making. The thermo-hydraulic characterization and design optimization of delta-shaped barriers in a solar water heating system were the topics of Khargotra et al [48]. There has been a considerable increase in the use of MCDM methods in diverse sectors, with a particular emphasis on methodologies such as WASPAS.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%