2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermo-mechanical behaviour of ultra-high strength concrete encased steel columns in standard fires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The λ of specimens (1,2,3,4,5,6), (7,8,9,10,11,12), and (13,14,15,16,17,18) were designed as 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5, respectively, and the net lengths (l 0 ) of corresponding specimens were 1080, 1440, and 1800 mm. The shear bending section between the loading point and supporting point bore shear force and bending moment, whose lengths (l sb ) were 270, 450, and 630 mm, respectively.…”
Section: Shear Span Ratio λmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The λ of specimens (1,2,3,4,5,6), (7,8,9,10,11,12), and (13,14,15,16,17,18) were designed as 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5, respectively, and the net lengths (l 0 ) of corresponding specimens were 1080, 1440, and 1800 mm. The shear bending section between the loading point and supporting point bore shear force and bending moment, whose lengths (l sb ) were 270, 450, and 630 mm, respectively.…”
Section: Shear Span Ratio λmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through statistical analysis, the volume ratio of longitudinal reinforcements and stirrups of SRC beams in engineering applications is between 1% and 3%. [42,43] To study the effect of steel fiber on crack elongation and mechanical properties of SSFRC beams with similar steel content, specimens (1,3,7,9,13,15), (2,4,8,10,14,16), and (5,6,11,12,17,18) were designed with ρ sf of 1%, 2% and 3%, respectively.…”
Section: Steel Fiber Volume Ratio ρ Sfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a preferred structural element type adopted in high-rise, large span and other heavily loaded structures, Steel Reinforced Concrete (SRC) column has been extensively researched in the past decades (El-Tawil et al, 1995; Lai and Liew, 2020a; Wang et al, 2019; Wu et al, 2019; Yang et al, 2018). Previous investigation covers a wide scope including the axial performance (Khan et al; Lai and Liew, 2021; Lai et al, 2019a; Lee et al, 2020; Khan et al, 2020a; Zhu et al, 2014; Yu et al, 2021), buckling behavior (Kim et al, 2014; Lai and Liew, 2020a, 2020b; Yang et al, 2019), flexural response (Kabir et al, 2020; Lai et al, 2021), fire resistance (Du et al, 2021; Li et al, 2021), shear strength (Xue et al, 2020; Xue et al, 2021), as well as the seismic performance under cyclic loading for a single member (Gautham and Dipti, 2021; Fang et al, 2015; Xue et al, 2019; Xue et al, 2020; Zhu et al, 2016) and a large-scale three-dimensional (3D) building frame (Liu et al, 2021). In addition to conventional steel and concrete materials, the behavior of SRC members made of Fiber Reinforced Concrete, Ultra High-Performance Concrete and Engineered Cementitious Composites have also been studied experimentally (Khan et al; Kabir et al, 2020; Lai et al, 2019b; Huang et al, 2020) and numerically (Khan et al, 2020b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Nevertheless, there are still many disadvantages to SRC. During construction, the simultaneous existence of the rebar cages and shape steel results in positional conflicts between shape steel and steel bars, which leads to the deterioration of the quality when pouring concrete and the difficulty of reinforcing steel binding, [4][5][6] as shown in Figure 1a. In addition, holes are usually opened on the flange and web of the shape steel during fabrication to prevent steel bars from being truncated, [7] as shown in Figure 1b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%