2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11043-020-09454-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermo-mechanical characterization of polyurea variants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same data were further used in the scatter diagram, as shown in Figure 13, to represent the results. [43][44][45][46][47]…”
Section: Parameter Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same data were further used in the scatter diagram, as shown in Figure 13, to represent the results. [43][44][45][46][47]…”
Section: Parameter Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 shows the values of all the simulation results based on all the input design variables. The same data were further used in the scatter diagram, as shown in Figure 13, to represent the results [43][44][45][46][47]. A graphical representation of all simulation results is shown in Figure 14.…”
Section: Parameter Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 7 ] A dispersion correction is applied to correct for the time shift of the signal as well as to correct for the dispersive behavior of the aluminum bars. [ 10 ] This correction was done based on the work of Gama et al, which offers a more detailed description of the dispersion correction process. [ 37 ] Dynamic equilibrium was assumed when the compression wave in the sample had traversed the sample three times, with a wave speed in the polycarbonate sample of ~4.5 km/s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] The split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) technique allows the characterization of the dynamic response high strain rates, ranging nominally from 10 2 to 10 4 s À1 . [6][7][8][9][10] The analysis of the dynamic compressive and tensile behavior of PC was reported by, among others, Prakash [11] and Wang, [4,12] respectively. Both studies showed that PC goes through a significant strain hardening after reaching the yield stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the transmission of the heat wave from the laser impingement would be negligible by the time it reaches the polyurea, making it an unlikely source for thermal softening. Therefore, the dynamic deformation of polyurea due to the localized adiabatic heating can be described by a balance between the mechanical stress and the heat transfer due to the heat capacity of the material within the plastic deformation (𝜖 p ) regime while suppressing the thermoelastic effect [69,72] 𝜌 p cΔT = ∍ 𝜎d𝜀 p (10) where 𝜌 p is the density of polyurea (1071 kg•m −3 ), c is the specific heat capacity (1150-1400 J•kg −1 •K −1 for temperatures ranging from −40 to 40 °C [73] ), and ΔT is the adiabatic temperature rise. The latter was estimated based on the plastic strain deduced from the bulging height shown in Figure 8 (𝜖 p ≈ 0.9, translating to ∟20 K change).…”
Section: Ductile Failure Of Shock-loaded Polyureamentioning
confidence: 99%