2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12289-016-1299-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermo-mechanical fatigue approach to predict tooling life in high temperature metal forming processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And on this basis, Su et al (2003) extended the above model to multiaxial TMF life prediction, in which mechanical fatigue damage was calculated using a modified Manson-Coffin equation. Escolan and Bielsa (2017) also presented a cumulative multiaxial thermomechanical fatigue life prediction model which is derived from the general cumulative TMF assumptions proposed by Neu and Sehitoglu. Seifert and von Hartrott (2017) and Hazime and Seifert (2017) have proposed a life prediction method based on crack-tip blunting model for TMF life prediction, and combined with the multiaxial critical plane approach, this model has been used to predict the fatigue life of multiaxial TMF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And on this basis, Su et al (2003) extended the above model to multiaxial TMF life prediction, in which mechanical fatigue damage was calculated using a modified Manson-Coffin equation. Escolan and Bielsa (2017) also presented a cumulative multiaxial thermomechanical fatigue life prediction model which is derived from the general cumulative TMF assumptions proposed by Neu and Sehitoglu. Seifert and von Hartrott (2017) and Hazime and Seifert (2017) have proposed a life prediction method based on crack-tip blunting model for TMF life prediction, and combined with the multiaxial critical plane approach, this model has been used to predict the fatigue life of multiaxial TMF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All three damages can operate under in-phase (IP) TMF loading, and the creep damage can be negligible under out-of-phase (OP) TMF loading. The model has been employed for the life prediction of the engineering components under TMF loading (Abu et al, 2014;Escola´n et al, 2017;Kang et al, 2007;Minichmayr et al, 2008). Furthermore, the fracture mechanics parameters, including cyclic stress intensity factor (Kraemer et al, 2017), the cyclic Jintegral (Christ et al, 2003;Esmaeilzadeh et al, 2017), and the cyclic crack-tip opening displacement (Seifert and Riedel, 2010;, were also investigated to estimate the crack growth rate under TMF loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%