“…As shown in Figure S5a, 1-g and 1-c in CH 2 Cl 2 show identical absorption and broad unstructured emission profiles, mainly stemming from the charge-transfer transitions, as suggested by TDDFT calculations of 1-g in CH 2 Cl 2 media (vide infra) and previously reported 1,2,4-triazole-based Cu(I) phosphine systems. − Polymorphs 1-g and 1-c give a broad unstructured emission band peaking at 498 and 487 nm, respectively, blue-shifted by 37 and 48 nm relative to that (535 nm) in CH 2 Cl 2 (Figure S5b), which is ascribed to the rigid matrix. − As depicted in Figure c and Table S3, when 1-g is ground, a red-shifted emission occurs in ground 1-g (511 nm), which is mainly attributable to the breaking of NH bpmtzH ···OClO 3 – hydrogen bonds under grinding, decreasing the LUMO basically localized on bpmtzH and hardly affecting the HOMO composed of Cu(I) and dppm and thus leading to a reduction of the HOMO–LUMO energy gap and a red-shifted emission. , Upon exposure of ground 1-g to CH 2 Cl 2 vapor, a blue-shifted emission similar to that of 1-g appears in reverted 1-g (498 nm), which is attributed to the rebuilding of NH bpmtzH ···OClO 3 – hydrogen bonds induced by CH 2 Cl 2 vapor, resulting in an increase in the HOMO–LUMO gap and blue-shifted emission. When exposure of 1-g to CHCl 3 vapor occurs, a cyan emission similar to that of 1-c appears in 1- g -c (484 nm), which is ascribed to the changes in NH bpmtzH ···OClO 3 – and intramolecular triazolyl/phenyl π···π interactions caused by different solvents, such as CH 2 Cl 2 and CHCl 3 , perhaps passing through CH solvent ···N bpmtzH hydrogen bonds.…”