2016
DOI: 10.1039/c5nj02916c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermochemical lignin depolymerization and conversion to aromatics in subcritical methanol: effects of catalytic conditions

Abstract: Solvolytic depolymerization of lignin was studied under three different catalytic conditions and explained using a schematic representation of the mechanisms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ekhe and co‐workers performed catalytic depolymerization of Kraft lignin in H 2 O/MeOH co‐solvents without addition of hydrogen and obtained high yields of alkylphenols with minimum char formation . Methanol reforming and condensation mechanism of lignin was proposed in the same group . The combination of Raney Ni and H‐USY outperformed Raney Ni or H‐USY alone for the catalytic hydrogenolysis of lignin due to synergistic catalytic effect .…”
Section: Conventional Approach – Catalytic Depolymerization Of Technimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ekhe and co‐workers performed catalytic depolymerization of Kraft lignin in H 2 O/MeOH co‐solvents without addition of hydrogen and obtained high yields of alkylphenols with minimum char formation . Methanol reforming and condensation mechanism of lignin was proposed in the same group . The combination of Raney Ni and H‐USY outperformed Raney Ni or H‐USY alone for the catalytic hydrogenolysis of lignin due to synergistic catalytic effect .…”
Section: Conventional Approach – Catalytic Depolymerization Of Technimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main components determined in wild and cultivated doraji are methyl‐furan (10.16, 10.29%), furfural (10.08, 16.17%), 5‐methyl‐furfural (8.49, 10.14%), 2‐furanmethanol (3.29, 2.31%) and 1‐(2‐furanyl)‐ethanone (3.38, 4.06%). The compounds 2‐methoxy‐phenol [1] (3.65%), 2‐methoxy‐4‐(1‐propenyl)‐phenol [2] (0.97%) and 1‐(4‐hydroxy‐3‐methoxyphenyl)‐2‐propanone [3] (2.05%) (Figure ), which might be the products of thermochemical lignin depolymerization (Singh, Nandeshwar, & Ekhe, ), in wild doraji were nearly 3 times higher than those in cultivated doraji with relative percentages of 1.08, 0.34 and 0.64%, respectively. These compounds together with furfural, methyl‐furfural, 1‐hydroxy‐2‐butanone, 2‐furanmethanol, acetate, 2‐hydroxy‐3‐methyl‐2‐cyclopenten‐1‐one, 2,5‐dimethyl‐4‐hydroxy‐3(2H)‐furanone and 2,2‐methylenebis‐furan, were significantly different in their percentages between the two kinds of samples ( P < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intermediate products undergo a condensation reaction, leading to a final product which is rich in solid carbon residues. This phenomenon is not observed in the case of zeolites, due to the presence of acid centers capable of catalyzing the direct methylation of the aromatic ring, which retard or prevent any potential condensation reactions [27].…”
Section: Depolymerization In Supercritical Liquidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is becoming increasingly common for the depolymerization of lignin to be carried out with the use of supercritical liquids [27][28][29][30]. The thermochemical depolymerization of lignin in supercritical methanol with various catalysts was studied by Singh et al [27]. Zeolites, sodium hydroxide, and iron filings were used in the process.…”
Section: Depolymerization In Supercritical Liquidsmentioning
confidence: 99%