2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4918689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic analysis of binary Fe85B15 to quinary Fe85Si2B8P4Cu1 alloys for primary crystallizations of α-Fe in nanocrystalline soft magnetic alloys

Abstract: Fe-based Fe85B15, Fe84B15Cu1, Fe82Si2B15Cu1, Fe85Si2B12Cu1, and Fe85Si2B8P4Cu1 (NANOMET®) alloys were experimental and computational analyzed to clarify the features of NANOMET that exhibits high saturation magnetic flux density (Bs) nearly 1.9 T and low core loss than conventional nanocrystalline soft magnetic alloys. The X-ray diffraction analysis for ribbon specimens produced experimentally by melt spinning from melts revealed that the samples were almost formed into an amorphous single phase. Then, the as-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, the largest size of Fe-based amorphous soft magnetic alloy (Fe66Co15Mo1P7.5C5.5B2Si3) have been reported being 2 mm, and its Bs is 1.65 T and ΔT(ΔT = Tx1-Tx2) is only 44 K [10]. Insufficient amorphous forming abilities of the Febased ribbons, usually less than 30 μm, limit their extensive applications [1,5,8]. Electric spark sintering (SPS) method [11] or additive manufacturing (3D printing, selective laser remelting, hot isostatic pressing, etc.)…”
Section: Introduction *mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, the largest size of Fe-based amorphous soft magnetic alloy (Fe66Co15Mo1P7.5C5.5B2Si3) have been reported being 2 mm, and its Bs is 1.65 T and ΔT(ΔT = Tx1-Tx2) is only 44 K [10]. Insufficient amorphous forming abilities of the Febased ribbons, usually less than 30 μm, limit their extensive applications [1,5,8]. Electric spark sintering (SPS) method [11] or additive manufacturing (3D printing, selective laser remelting, hot isostatic pressing, etc.)…”
Section: Introduction *mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, composition variations and processing parameters (e.g., heat treatment schedule) play an integral role in modeling the microstructure(s) responsible for achieving desired properties, where optimizing processing parameters along with composition remains a challenging task. 21 As an alternative to costly experimentation, the CALPHAD approach allows for investigating the effect of composition variations and heat treatment on the size distribution and volume fraction of the phase(s) that are responsible for optimal or desired properties; indeed, it has been used for studying soft magnets containing amorphous phases [22][23][24] using the commercial software Thermocalc. 25 Recent studies indicate that simulations based on CALPHAD 26,27 are in need of efficiency improvements if they are to be used for optimization of the composition and heat treatment schedule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%