2012
DOI: 10.1134/s0036024412040346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic and kinetic parameters of ofloxacin adsorption from aqueous solution onto modified coal fly ash

Abstract: Batch adsorption experiments were carried out for the removal of ofloxacin from aqueous solution using modified coal fly ash as adsorbent. The effects of various parameters such as contact time, initial solu tion concentration and temperature on the adsorption system were investigated. The optimum contact time was found to be 150 min. The adsorption isotherm data fit well with the Langmuir model, and the kinetic data fit well with the pseudo second order and the intra particle diffusion model. Intra particle d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two biochar produced in the study by Akhtar et al [47] present SBET of only 0.144 and 1.99 m 2 g -1 , but the capacities of both materials were high, being 3702 and 669.5 mg g -1 , respectively. In the third situation, the coal fly ash material had an area of only 17.5 m 2 g -1 , where a low q= 2.643 mg g -1 was also observed [135]. The same situation was observed in the study by Jaswal et al [57], where capacity (37.31 mg g -1 ) and surface area (17.17 m 2 g -1 ) showed low values.…”
Section: Morphological Properties and Performance Of Adsorbents Devel...supporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The two biochar produced in the study by Akhtar et al [47] present SBET of only 0.144 and 1.99 m 2 g -1 , but the capacities of both materials were high, being 3702 and 669.5 mg g -1 , respectively. In the third situation, the coal fly ash material had an area of only 17.5 m 2 g -1 , where a low q= 2.643 mg g -1 was also observed [135]. The same situation was observed in the study by Jaswal et al [57], where capacity (37.31 mg g -1 ) and surface area (17.17 m 2 g -1 ) showed low values.…”
Section: Morphological Properties and Performance Of Adsorbents Devel...supporting
confidence: 68%
“…x pseudo-second order/not linear 0.99 [54] Thermal kaolin 250 pseudo-second order/not linear 0.97 [64] Bentonite clay 200 pseudo-second order/not linear 0.99 [56] Rice husk 480 pseudo-second order/not linear 0.99 [129] Boron nitride nanosheets 100 pseudo-second order/not linear 0.99 [130] Hydroxyapatite/activated carbon (HAP/AC) 60 pseudo-second order/not linear 0.97 [50] Rice husk ash 180 pseudo-second order/not linear 0.97 [38] Chitosan/Biochar Composite 30 pseudo-second order/not linear 0.95 [132] AC derived from luffa sponge 240 pseudo-second order/not linear 0.99 [11] Magnetic carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals (M-CCNs) 20 pseudo-second order/not linear 0.99 [133] rGO-MoS2 heterostructure 240 pseudo-second order/linear 0.91 [57] AC from Cassava Stem 120 pseudo-second order/linear 0.98 [55] Fe/Cu oxides composite 20 Double-constant rate equation/not linear 0.99 [46] Fe/Co bimetallic modified biochar 360 pseudo-second order/not linear 0.97 [58] Copper-Doped ZIF-8 180 pseudo-second order/not linear 0.99 [21] Fe3O4@MIL-100(Fe) 30 pseudo-second order/not linear 0.97 [51] Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8 (ZIF-8) 120 pseudo-second order/not linear 0.99 [52] Bagasse biochar 90 pseudo-second order/linear 0.99 [59] rGO@CuO/6A5N2TU colloidal heterostructures 50 pseudo-second order/not linear 0.99 [60] Coal fly ash 150 pseudo-second order/not linear 0.99 [135] Industrial sludge (AC) 240 pseudo-second order/not linear 0.94 [61]…”
Section: Contact Time and Best-fit Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, it must be pointed out that the sorption efficiency determined in this work for CIP and OFL are in an intermediate range of reported values for other mineral sorbents, activated carbons and biomass extracts (El-Shafey 2012; Liu et al 2013;Wang et al 2014;Zhang et al 2012). For OTC, the OST100 sorption efficiency (ca.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%