2005
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.46.1240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic and Structural Properties for the FeO&ndash;SiO<SUB>2</SUB> System by using Molecular Dynamics Calculation

Abstract: Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation has been widely used as a very useful method for the calculation of thermodynamic, structural and transport properties for the molten slags and fluxes at high temperatures. In this study, MD simulation using the Born-Mayer-Huggins type pairwise potential with partial ionic charges has been used to calculate the thermodynamic, structural and transport properties for the FeO-SiO 2 system. The calculated structural properties such as pair distribution functions and fractions of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also values of 4.5 (Sun et al 26 ) and 4.7 (Guillot et al 27 ) have been predicted using classical MD simulations. Classical MD calculations of molten FeO by Seo et al 28 predict n FeO = 4.2, and are able to reproduce transport properties of the FeO-SiO 2 system, although the model density is significantly lower than experiments would suggest 29 . To explore this further, we have carried out a series of classical MD simulations of molten FeO using seven published inter-atomic pair potential sets (see Table 2 and Supplementary Table S1 and Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also values of 4.5 (Sun et al 26 ) and 4.7 (Guillot et al 27 ) have been predicted using classical MD simulations. Classical MD calculations of molten FeO by Seo et al 28 predict n FeO = 4.2, and are able to reproduce transport properties of the FeO-SiO 2 system, although the model density is significantly lower than experiments would suggest 29 . To explore this further, we have carried out a series of classical MD simulations of molten FeO using seven published inter-atomic pair potential sets (see Table 2 and Supplementary Table S1 and Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with 0% Fe 3+ were performed using the DL_POLY package 41 on a system containing ∼6000 atoms. Several published potentials 27,28,[42][43][44][45] were tested. The results of Monte Carlo simulations under the EPSR reference potentials were used as starting configurations for the MD simulations, which were conducted either in the canonical (NVT) or the isothermal-isobaric (NPT) ensemble, using a Hoover-Nose thermostat or thermostat-barostat, at P = 1 atm and various temperatures.…”
Section: Atomistic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Born-Mayer-Huggins (BMH) potential, which has been successfully used to describe the interactions between ions of ferrosilicate melts and glasses, 14,19,20) was applied to simulate the FSV system. This ionic potential consists of the long-range Coulomb, the short-range repulsive and van der Waals (attractive dipole-dipole) interactions.…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18] Meanwhile, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, as a approach complementary to experimental techniques, has also been applied to investigate the structure and properties of ferrosilicate systems. 14,19,20) Both experimental and simulation work have suggested that SiO 4 tetrahedron is the fundamental building block for silicates, while the structural behavior of Fe 2 + is still debated. Fe 2 + adopts 4-, 5-or 6-fold coordination were found in silicate melts and glasses under different silicate composition, temperature, pressure and f O 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase of Q 2 is much lower than Q 0 . The mechanism can be explained by following reactions 2 Fe2++ SinormalO44true(Q0true)=(Fe2SiO4)associte 2 Si2normalO76true(Q1true)=normalSnormali3O108(normalQ2)+SinormalO44(normalQ0) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%